<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DavidKGray</id>
	<title>Glottopedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DavidKGray"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/DavidKGray"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T21:47:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Perfective&amp;diff=5362</id>
		<title>Perfective</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Perfective&amp;diff=5362"/>
		<updated>2008-02-01T11:57:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DavidKGray: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If a language has a perfective aspect in its verbs system, then the verb form describes the whole action, beginning, middle and end in one go. This means that the perfective describes a complete situation, but it is not 'completed', according to Comrie, 'The use of &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot;... puts too much emphasis on the termination of the situation, whereas the use of the perfective puts no more emphasis, necessarily, on the end of the situation than on any other part of the situation.' (Comrie, ''Aspect'', 18)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DavidKGray</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Perfective&amp;diff=5361</id>
		<title>Perfective</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Perfective&amp;diff=5361"/>
		<updated>2008-02-01T11:57:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DavidKGray: Perfective denotes a complete action&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If a language has a perfective aspect in its verbs system, then the verb form describes the whole action, beginning, middle and end in one go. This means that the perfective describes a complete situation, but it is no 'completed', according to Comrie, 'The use of &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot;... puts too much emphasis on the termination of the situation, whereas the use of the perfective puts no more emphasis, necessarily, on the end of the situation than on any other part of the situation.' (Comrie, ''Aspect'', 18)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DavidKGray</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Evidentiality&amp;diff=4937</id>
		<title>Evidentiality</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Evidentiality&amp;diff=4937"/>
		<updated>2007-12-14T14:56:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DavidKGray: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Evidentiality''' is a way of marking [[epistemic modality]], i.e. how we know something is true. Some languages grammaticise evidentiality (mark it in their verb system).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Example===&lt;br /&gt;
Turkmen, for example, has four levels of evidentiality - direct, inferred, assumed, and reported. These are marked in the following way:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''al-dy'' 's/he took'; &lt;br /&gt;
''al-ypdyr'' 's/he took (but I didn't see it)'; &lt;br /&gt;
''alan eken'' 's/he apparently took'; &lt;br /&gt;
''al-anmyş'' 'it is rumoured that s/he took'. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to use these correctly, otherwise the wrong impression can be conveyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other languages===&lt;br /&gt;
German [[Evidenzialität]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DavidKGray</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>