<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dtgorgis</id>
	<title>Glottopedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dtgorgis"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Dtgorgis"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T20:51:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Infix&amp;diff=4398</id>
		<title>Infix</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Infix&amp;diff=4398"/>
		<updated>2007-10-27T22:21:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dtgorgis: /* Comment */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;An '''infix''' is an [[affix]] which occurs inside its [[base]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comment===&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes the term ''infix'' is also used for [[adfix]]es that occur nonperipherally in a word, but not inside another morpheme. However, this usage of ''infix'' is usually regarded as erroneous.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Now, shouldn’t we analyze ''-al'' in ''decolonialization'' also as an infix (after all, it occurs inside a word)? The answer is ‘no.’ True, ''-al'' occurs inside a complex word, but crucially it does not occur inside another morpheme.&amp;quot; (Plag 2003:11)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arabic infixes are vocalic patterns within so-called 'discontinuous morphemes', traditionally called 'roots'. For example, the triconsonantal root {k..t..b} is the discontinuous morpheme, which carries the meaning of 'writing', into which a vocalic pattern such as {..a..a} can be infixed to give you /katab/ (a pausal form), meaning 'wrote'. In fact, the morphemic analysis of past verb forms in Arabic is more complex than it might overtly seem were we to add gender as yet a third morpheme. (D T Gorgis,2007, Jordan).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin===&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''infix'' is first attested in the last quarter of the 19th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
Plag, Ingo. 2003. ''English word-formation.'' Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other languages===&lt;br /&gt;
German [[Infix (de)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Morphology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dtgorgis</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Infix&amp;diff=4397</id>
		<title>Infix</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Infix&amp;diff=4397"/>
		<updated>2007-10-27T22:15:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dtgorgis: /* Comment */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;An '''infix''' is an [[affix]] which occurs inside its [[base]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comment===&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes the term ''infix'' is also used for [[adfix]]es that occur nonperipherally in a word, but not inside another morpheme. However, this usage of ''infix'' is usually regarded as erroneous.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Now, shouldn’t we analyze ''-al'' in ''decolonialization'' also as an infix (after all, it occurs inside a word)? The answer is ‘no.’ True, ''-al'' occurs inside a complex word, but crucially it does not occur inside another morpheme.&amp;quot; (Plag 2003:11)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arabic infixes are vocalic patterns within so-called 'discontinuous morphemes', traditionally called 'roots'. For example, the triconsonantal root {k..t..b} is the discontinuous morpheme, which carries the meaning of 'writing', into which a vocalic pattern such as {..a..a} can be infixed to give you /katab/ (a pausal form), meaning 'wrote'. In fact, the morphemic analysis of past verb forms in Arabic is more complex than it might overtly seem were we to add gender as yet a third morpheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin===&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''infix'' is first attested in the last quarter of the 19th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
Plag, Ingo. 2003. ''English word-formation.'' Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other languages===&lt;br /&gt;
German [[Infix (de)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Morphology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dtgorgis</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>