User:Andynsaffa/Conceptual Metaphors - Revision history

Andynsaffa at 06:55, 30 May 2024

2024-05-30T06:55:49Z

Andynsaffa at 06:50, 30 May 2024

2024-05-30T06:50:10Z

Andynsaffa at 06:48, 30 May 2024

2024-05-30T06:48:21Z

Andynsaffa at 06:46, 30 May 2024

2024-05-30T06:46:25Z

Andynsaffa at 15:33, 24 May 2024

2024-05-24T15:33:24Z

Wohlgemuth: Wohlgemuth moved page Conceptual Metaphors to User:Andynsaffa/Conceptual Metaphors without leaving a redirect: please make draft in user namespace

2024-05-16T08:18:17Z

Wohlgemuth moved page Conceptual Metaphors to User:Andynsaffa/Conceptual Metaphors without leaving a redirect: please make draft in user namespace

Andynsaffa: I added more explanation in this entry

2024-05-16T05:30:17Z

I added more explanation in this entry

Andynsaffa: I added some text in this entry by citing a book titled "Metaphors we Live By" by Lakoff and Johnson.

2024-05-16T05:19:30Z

I added some text in this entry by citing a book titled "Metaphors we Live By" by Lakoff and Johnson.

Andynsaffa: Created page with "Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). These metaphors..."

2024-05-16T05:15:08Z

Created page with "Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). These metaphors..."

New page

Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). These metaphors are embedded in everyday language and thought, structuring our experiences unconsciously. For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:

"He ''attacked'' my point."

"I ''defended'' my position."

"She ''won'' the argument."

In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target).

This entry is still in progress

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Conceptual Metaphor Theory ==
-==== Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
+Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
 For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:
- ====
+- "He ''attacked'' my point."
-* Bulleted list item
+- "I ''defended'' my position."
-"He ''attacked'' my point."
+- "She ''won'' the argument."
-* Bulleted list item
+In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
 Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors.
-# Numbered list item
+== Structural Metaphor ==
-Structural Metaphor
+Structural metaphor is a type of metaphor that conceptualizes a more abstract thing into a more abstract concept. Structural metaphor are based on two domains, the source domain and the target domain. It assumes that the target domain is based on systematic correlations in our daily experience. An example of a structural metaphor given by Lakoff and Jphnson in the concept "time is money, time is a limited resource, time is a precious object" is:
 What to write next:
 - examples of structural metaphors
 - The definition of orientational metaphors

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Conceptual Metaphor Theory
+== Conceptual Metaphor Theory ==
-Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
+==== Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
 For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:
+ ====
 "He ''attacked'' my point."
 "I ''defended'' my position."
 "She ''won'' the argument."
-In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
+===== In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
 Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors.
-. Structural Metaphor
+# Numbered list item

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 30 May 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:
	- The definition of ontological metaphors		- The definition of ontological metaphors
	- The example of ontological metaphors		- The example of ontological metaphors
		+
		+	Reference
		+	Lakoff,G., & Johnson,M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
@@ Line 11: / Line 13: @@
 In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
 Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors.
 What to write next:
@@ Line 20: / Line 26: @@
 - The definition of ontological metaphors
 - The example of ontological metaphors

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, Metaphors We Live By. The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
+Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
 For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
-''This article is still on progress
+Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors.
-''

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:18, 16 May 2024
(No difference)