Difference between revisions of "Affix"
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | An '''affix''' is a [[morph]] that always occurs attached to another morph, | + | An '''affix''' is a [[morph]] that always occurs attached to another morph and forms a phonological unit with that morph. Affixes are most often phonologically reduced, i.e. short. They often have a semantically bleached meaning (vague, abstract, grammatical), especially compared to [[root]]s. The element to which an affix attaches to is called the [[base]] or root. |
| + | |||
| + | Affixes are distinct from [[compound]]s in that the entities that form a compound can occur independently on their own and that they do not form a productive pattern. Affixes have a predictable function and can typically attach to a large number of words whereas compounds tend to be more restricted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whether or not [[reduplication]] is a case of affixation is not entirely clear. Theoretically, one can define reduplication as affixation where the attached affix (be it in-, pre, circum- or post-) is so formally weak that it harmonises with the root. | ||
:::*''"In general, affixes are subsidiary to roots, while roots are the centers of such constructions as words. Roots are frequently longer than affixes, and generally much more numerous in the vocabulary."'' (Gleason 1955:59) | :::*''"In general, affixes are subsidiary to roots, while roots are the centers of such constructions as words. Roots are frequently longer than affixes, and generally much more numerous in the vocabulary."'' (Gleason 1955:59) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
*[[confix]] | *[[confix]] | ||
*[[introfix]] | *[[introfix]] | ||
| + | *[[suprafix]] | ||
===Origin=== | ===Origin=== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
*{{:Bauer 1988}} | *{{:Bauer 1988}} | ||
| + | *Bauer, Laurie. 2003. ''Introducing linguistic morphology'' (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0-87840-343-4 | ||
*{{:Gleason 1955}} | *{{:Gleason 1955}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Link === | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Affix&lemmacode=996 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
===Other languages=== | ===Other languages=== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 43: | ||
*German [[Affix (de)]] | *German [[Affix (de)]] | ||
*Russian [[аффикс]] | *Russian [[аффикс]] | ||
| − | + | *Spanish [[afijo]] | |
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category: Morphology]] | [[Category: Morphology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:57, 13 January 2014
An affix is a morph that always occurs attached to another morph and forms a phonological unit with that morph. Affixes are most often phonologically reduced, i.e. short. They often have a semantically bleached meaning (vague, abstract, grammatical), especially compared to roots. The element to which an affix attaches to is called the base or root.
Affixes are distinct from compounds in that the entities that form a compound can occur independently on their own and that they do not form a productive pattern. Affixes have a predictable function and can typically attach to a large number of words whereas compounds tend to be more restricted.
Whether or not reduplication is a case of affixation is not entirely clear. Theoretically, one can define reduplication as affixation where the attached affix (be it in-, pre, circum- or post-) is so formally weak that it harmonises with the root.
- "In general, affixes are subsidiary to roots, while roots are the centers of such constructions as words. Roots are frequently longer than affixes, and generally much more numerous in the vocabulary." (Gleason 1955:59)
- “Obligatorily bound morphs which do not realise lexemes and which are attached to roots to produce word-forms are called affixes.” (Bauer 1988:11)
Subtypes
- prefix
- suffix
- infix
- circumfix
- adfix
- postfix
- antefix
- duplifix
- ambifix
- interfix
- simulfix
- confix
- introfix
- suprafix
Origin
Formed from Latin ad ‘to’ and fixus ‘fixed’. The term affix is attested in English since the 17th century. Before that, morphology was generally described in terms of paradigms rather than in terms of constituent elements such as affixes and roots.
See also
Affixes (survey article)
References
- Bauer, Laurie. 1988. Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0-87840-343-4
- Gleason, H. Allan. 1955. An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Link
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
Other languages
- French affixe
- German Affix (de)
- Russian аффикс
- Spanish afijo
