Difference between revisions of "User:Andynsaffa/Conceptual Metaphors"
Andynsaffa (talk | contribs) |
Andynsaffa (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Conceptual Metaphor Theory | + | == Conceptual Metaphor Theory == |
| − | Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). | + | ==== Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source). |
For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments: | For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments: | ||
| − | + | ==== | |
| + | * Bulleted list item | ||
"He ''attacked'' my point." | "He ''attacked'' my point." | ||
| + | * Bulleted list item | ||
"I ''defended'' my position." | "I ''defended'' my position." | ||
| + | * Bulleted list item | ||
"She ''won'' the argument." | "She ''won'' the argument." | ||
| − | In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this. | + | ===== In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we ''do'' in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this. |
Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors. | Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors. | ||
| + | ===== | ||
| − | + | # Numbered list item | |
| + | Structural Metaphor | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 30 May 2024
Conceptual Metaphor Theory
==== Conceptual Metaphor Theory is a framework developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their 1980 book, "Metaphors We Live By". The theory posits that metaphors are not merely linguistic expressions but fundamental mechanisms of human thought, influencing how we perceive, think, and act. Conceptual metaphors are pervasive patterns of thought where one idea or conceptual domain (the target) is understood in terms of another domain (the source).
For instance, the metaphor "ARGUMENT IS WAR" shapes the way we talk and think about arguments:
====
- Bulleted list item
"He attacked my point."
- Bulleted list item
"I defended my position."
- Bulleted list item
"She won the argument."
===== In the examples above, the domain of war (source) provides the framework for understanding arguments (target). Lakoff and Johnson (1980) proposed that many of the things we do in arguing are partially structured by the concept of "war". Eventhough there aren't any physical battle but there is a verbal battle and the structure of an argument (attack, defense, counterattack, etc) reflects this.
Lakoff and Johnson, then categorized conceptual metaphors into three distinct types of metaphors which include structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors.
=====
- Numbered list item
Structural Metaphor
What to write next: - The definition of structural metaphors - examples of structural metaphors - The definition of orientational metaphors - Some examples of orientational metaphors - The definition of ontological metaphors - The example of ontological metaphors
Reference Lakoff,G., & Johnson,M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago.
