Difference between revisions of "Morpheme"
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (→Polysemy) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A '''morpheme''' is the smallest meaning -bearing unit of language. | + | A '''morpheme''' is the smallest meaning-bearing unit of language. The term thus refers to the smallest component of a word that (a) seems to contribute some sort of meaning, or a grammatical function to the word to which it belongs, and (b) cannot itself be decomposed into smaller morphemes. |
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Polysemy=== | ===Polysemy=== | ||
| − | ''Morpheme'' may also be used for 'grammatical morpheme', see [[ | + | ''Morpheme'' may also be used for 'grammatical morpheme', see [[grammatical morpheme]]. |
===Synonym=== | ===Synonym=== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Origin=== | ===Origin=== | ||
The term ''morpheme'' was coined by [[Jan Baudouin de Courtenay]] in c. 1880. It is based on Greek ''morph-'' 'form' and the suffix -eme, on the analogy of the term ''phoneme''. See Mugdan (1986) for detailed discussion. | The term ''morpheme'' was coined by [[Jan Baudouin de Courtenay]] in c. 1880. It is based on Greek ''morph-'' 'form' and the suffix -eme, on the analogy of the term ''phoneme''. See Mugdan (1986) for detailed discussion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Controversy=== | ||
| + | The concept "morpheme" is not uncontroversial. A number of linguists dispute the explanatory power of the morpheme as a theoretical construct, and also dispute the notion that the morpheme has any psychological reality (cf. Bochner). Consider, for example, the following singular~plural pairs in English: "kangaroo"~"kangaroos"; "mouse"~"mice"; "child"~"children"; "sheep"~"sheep"; "person"~"people". | ||
===related terms=== | ===related terms=== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
| − | Mugdan, Joachim. 1986. Was ist eigentlich ein Morphem? | + | Mugdan, Joachim. 1986. Was ist eigentlich ein Morphem? In: ''Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung'' 39(1): 29–43. |
| + | |||
| + | === Links === | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morpheme&lemmacode=562 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| + | |||
===Other languages=== | ===Other languages=== | ||
| − | German [[Morphem]] Spanish [[morfema]] Chinese [[语素]] | + | *German [[Morphem]] <br> |
| + | *Spanish [[morfema]] <br> | ||
| + | *Chinese [[语素]] <br> | ||
| + | *Russian [[морфема]]<br> | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Morphology]] | [[Category:Morphology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:44, 6 June 2024
A morpheme is the smallest meaning-bearing unit of language. The term thus refers to the smallest component of a word that (a) seems to contribute some sort of meaning, or a grammatical function to the word to which it belongs, and (b) cannot itself be decomposed into smaller morphemes.
Examples
Kangaroo is one morpheme. Kangaroos is two morphemes, kangaroo and plural -s. The -s expresses the meaning 'many' or 'more than one' in this example.
Polysemy
Morpheme may also be used for 'grammatical morpheme', see grammatical morpheme.
Synonym
- moneme (Martinet)
Origin
The term morpheme was coined by Jan Baudouin de Courtenay in c. 1880. It is based on Greek morph- 'form' and the suffix -eme, on the analogy of the term phoneme. See Mugdan (1986) for detailed discussion.
Controversy
The concept "morpheme" is not uncontroversial. A number of linguists dispute the explanatory power of the morpheme as a theoretical construct, and also dispute the notion that the morpheme has any psychological reality (cf. Bochner). Consider, for example, the following singular~plural pairs in English: "kangaroo"~"kangaroos"; "mouse"~"mice"; "child"~"children"; "sheep"~"sheep"; "person"~"people".
Reference
Mugdan, Joachim. 1986. Was ist eigentlich ein Morphem? In: Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39(1): 29–43.
Links
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
