Difference between revisions of "Epistemic modality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) (partially based on Tarsee Li's glossary in "The Verbal System of the Aramaic of Daniel") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | '''Epistemic modality''' refers to the conveyance of the speaker’s attitude toward the factualness of a proposition. |
+ | |||
+ | ===Examples=== | ||
+ | Sentences such as “John may be in his office” or “Mary could be at school by now” (Palmer 2001:26, 32) are examples of the expression of epistemic modality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Comments=== | ||
+ | Traditionally, epistemic modality and [[deontic modality]] were considered the major subdivisions of modality. Palmer (2001) prefers to classify epistemic and evidential as the major subdivisions of “propositional modality.” According to Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994: 176-181), epistemic is one of four major types of modality, along with [[agent-oriented modality]], [[speaker-oriented modality]], and [[subordinate modality]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | *{{:Bybee et al. 1994}} | ||
+ | *Palmer 2001 | ||
===Other languages=== | ===Other languages=== | ||
Line 6: | Line 16: | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Semantics]] | [[Category:Semantics]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Modality]] |
Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 June 2009
Epistemic modality refers to the conveyance of the speaker’s attitude toward the factualness of a proposition.
Examples
Sentences such as “John may be in his office” or “Mary could be at school by now” (Palmer 2001:26, 32) are examples of the expression of epistemic modality.
Comments
Traditionally, epistemic modality and deontic modality were considered the major subdivisions of modality. Palmer (2001) prefers to classify epistemic and evidential as the major subdivisions of “propositional modality.” According to Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994: 176-181), epistemic is one of four major types of modality, along with agent-oriented modality, speaker-oriented modality, and subordinate modality.
References
- Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Palmer 2001
Other languages
German epistemische Modalität