Difference between revisions of "A-over-A"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In [[generative grammar]], the '''A-over-A principle''' says that if a rule ambiguously refers to A in a structure of the form of (i), the rule must apply to the higher, more inclusive, node A (Chomsky 1964). | |
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===See also=== | ===See also=== | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[island condition]] |
===Link=== | ===Link=== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 6 February 2008
In generative grammar, the A-over-A principle says that if a rule ambiguously refers to A in a structure of the form of (i), the rule must apply to the higher, more inclusive, node A (Chomsky 1964).
Examples
This principle prevents extraction of the NP Africa out of the NP my trip to Africa in which it is included in (ii)b, but allows the more inclusive NP to be fronted in (ii)c.
(i) ... [A ... [A ...
(ii) a I won't forget [NP my trip to [NP Africa ]].
b *Africa, I won't forget my trip to
c my trip to Africa, I won't forget
Comment
More recently, the A-over-A principle has been reduced to principles such as the ECP.
See also
Link
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
References
- Chomsky, Noam A. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.
- Ross, J.R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. MIT (published as Infinite syntax! Ablex, Norwood 1986).
