Reciprocal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Changed the format a little |
Edited the format, removed the block {{cats}} |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub | {{stub}} | ||
==Definition== | |||
'''Reciprocal'''s behave as [[anaphor]]s with respect to [[binding theory]], and require a plural antecedent (*''that gang hates each other''). | '''Reciprocal'''s behave as [[anaphor]]s with respect to [[binding theory]], and require a plural antecedent (*''that gang hates each other''). | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
(i) [John and Mary]<sub>i </sub>can't stand ''each other''<sub>i </sub> | (i) [John and Mary]<sub>i </sub>can't stand ''each other''<sub>i </sub> | ||
== Links == | |||
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Reciprocal&lemmacode=316 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] <br> | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Reciprocal&lemmacode=316 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] <br> | ||
== References == | |||
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht. | * Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht. | ||
* Heim, L.,H. Lasnik & R. May 1991. ''Reciprocity and Plurality,'' Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63-102 | * Heim, L.,H. Lasnik & R. May 1991. ''Reciprocity and Plurality,'' Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63-102 | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:28, 28 September 2014
| STUB |
Definition
Reciprocals behave as anaphors with respect to binding theory, and require a plural antecedent (*that gang hates each other).
An example would be an element such as each other in (i).
(i) [John and Mary]i can't stand each otheri
Links
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
References
- Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
- Heim, L.,H. Lasnik & R. May 1991. Reciprocity and Plurality, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63-102