Difference between revisions of "Scope"
(Edited the format) |
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}}) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It is usually assumed that for those syntactic elements which are interpreted as elements with scope (e.g. NPs such as ''everyone'' and ''who'', which are interpreted as (quantificational) operators), the scope assigned to the element that is the interpretation of the syntactic element is determined as a function of the syntactic context of the syntactic element. It has often been assumed, furthermore, that the notion [[c-command]] plays a crucial role in the determination of the scope of (the interpretation of) quantificational and other scopal elements. Thus, May (1977) states that "the scope of a quantifier phi is everything which it c-commands" (meaning: at LF). Thus, if the relevant syntactic level of representation where scope is determined is the level of LF (which is denied, e.g., by Williams (1986)) then which LFs can be derived from a given S-structure determines the possible scopal orders of the scopal elements in the structure (see [[scope ambiguity]], [[QR]]). | It is usually assumed that for those syntactic elements which are interpreted as elements with scope (e.g. NPs such as ''everyone'' and ''who'', which are interpreted as (quantificational) operators), the scope assigned to the element that is the interpretation of the syntactic element is determined as a function of the syntactic context of the syntactic element. It has often been assumed, furthermore, that the notion [[c-command]] plays a crucial role in the determination of the scope of (the interpretation of) quantificational and other scopal elements. Thus, May (1977) states that "the scope of a quantifier phi is everything which it c-commands" (meaning: at LF). Thus, if the relevant syntactic level of representation where scope is determined is the level of LF (which is denied, e.g., by Williams (1986)) then which LFs can be derived from a given S-structure determines the possible scopal orders of the scopal elements in the structure (see [[scope ambiguity]], [[QR]]). | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Scope&lemmacode=204 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Scope&lemmacode=204 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | + | == References == | |
*Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. | *Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Semantics]] | [[Category:Semantics]] | ||
| − | {{stub}}{{cats | + | {{stub}}{{cats}} |
Revision as of 07:33, 16 August 2014
Definition
Scope is that part of a formula to which an operator is prefixed.
Example
phi is the scope of Neg in Neg phi and of All(x) in All(x) [ phi ]. The scope of an operator in complex formulas is determined by brackets. In the formula in (i) the subformula P(x) -> Q(y) is the scope of All(x), but R(x) is outside the scope of All(x).
(i) All(x) [ P(x) -> Q(y) ] & R(x)
Syntax
It is usually assumed that for those syntactic elements which are interpreted as elements with scope (e.g. NPs such as everyone and who, which are interpreted as (quantificational) operators), the scope assigned to the element that is the interpretation of the syntactic element is determined as a function of the syntactic context of the syntactic element. It has often been assumed, furthermore, that the notion c-command plays a crucial role in the determination of the scope of (the interpretation of) quantificational and other scopal elements. Thus, May (1977) states that "the scope of a quantifier phi is everything which it c-commands" (meaning: at LF). Thus, if the relevant syntactic level of representation where scope is determined is the level of LF (which is denied, e.g., by Williams (1986)) then which LFs can be derived from a given S-structure determines the possible scopal orders of the scopal elements in the structure (see scope ambiguity, QR).
Links
References
- Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. Logic, language, and meaning, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
