Difference between revisions of "Speech-act participant"
(create) |
m (+cat) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. In ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', Vol. 63, No. 1. University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–143 | Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. In ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', Vol. 63, No. 1. University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–143 | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{dc}} |
Revision as of 17:30, 29 March 2008
Definition
Speech-act participant (abbreviated SAP) refers to 1st or 2nd person to the exclusion of 3rd person.
Example
Certain subsystems of a language’s grammar are sensitive to speech-act participants. (They do not distinguish between 1st or 2nd person, but contrast them both with third person (non-speech-act participant).)
In Sahaptin, the ergative case appears on 3rd person nouns only if the object is a speech-act participant (Rude 1997):
ɨwínš-nɨm=naš | i-q̓ínun-a |
man-ERG=1SG | 3nom-see-PST |
The man saw me. |
ɨwínš-nɨm=am | i-q̓ínun-a |
man-ERG=2SG | 3nom-see-PST |
The man saw you. |
If the object is not a speech-act participant, the 3rd person noun may not be marked by ergative case:
ɨwínš | i-q̓ínun-a | miyánaš-na |
man | 3nom-see-PST | child-ACC |
The man saw the child. | ||
(*ɨwínš-nɨm i-q̓ínun-a miyánaš-na) |
Comment
In some literature (e.g. Andrews 1985), the term local is used for the speech-act participant.
Origin
Synonyms
References
Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Language Typology and syntactic description, vol. 1. Clause structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen, pp. 62–154
Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. In International Journal of American Linguistics, Vol. 63, No. 1. University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–143