Difference between revisions of "Promotion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) (New page: In syntax, a '''promotion''' is a change of grammatical relations (or a valency change) by which an argument comes to assume a higher-ranking position on a [[grammatical re...) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
| − | *[[Van Valin, Robert D.]] 1980. On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. ''Lingua'' 50: 303-327. | + | *[[Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.]] 1980. On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. ''Lingua'' 50: 303-327. |
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 12 November 2008
In syntax, a promotion is a change of grammatical relations (or a valency change) by which an argument comes to assume a higher-ranking position on a grammatical relations hierarchy. The opposite of a promotion in this sense is a demotion.
- ""Promotion" will here be used to refer to a change in the syntactic status of an NP such that it becomes accessible to one or more grammatical processes which it could not otherwise undergo, for example, relativization." (Van Valin 1980:316)
Example
The best-known example of a promotion is the change of object to subject in a passive construction.
Comments
The term was widespread in quasi-generative and typological work of the 1970s and 1980s. It was never used in narrowly Chomskyan work, and the technical term of relational grammar is advancement.
Reference
- Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1980. On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. Lingua 50: 303-327.
