Difference between revisions of "Super raising"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
'''Super raising''' is a construction in which a [[subject]] position is skipped in applying [[Subject Raising]]. The result is ungrammatical. | '''Super raising''' is a construction in which a [[subject]] position is skipped in applying [[Subject Raising]]. The result is ungrammatical. | ||
| − | + | == Example == | |
| − | + | Next to (i), which is an ordinary case of subject raising, (ii) is impossible, since the subject position taken by ''it'' is skipped in moving ''Vitesse'' to the subject position of ''seems''. | |
| − | |||
(i) Vitesse seems [t to win] | (i) Vitesse seems [t to win] | ||
(ii) *Vitesse seems [that it is certain [t to win]] | (ii) *Vitesse seems [that it is certain [t to win]] | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Super+raising&lemmacode=296 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Super+raising&lemmacode=296 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
* Chomsky, N. 1998. ''Minimalist inquiries: the framework,'' MIT working papers in linguistics. | * Chomsky, N. 1998. ''Minimalist inquiries: the framework,'' MIT working papers in linguistics. | ||
* Chomsky, N. 1995. ''The minimalist program,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London. | * Chomsky, N. 1995. ''The minimalist program,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
| − | {{stub}}{{cats | + | {{stub}}{{cats}} |
Latest revision as of 08:06, 16 August 2014
Definition
Super raising is a construction in which a subject position is skipped in applying Subject Raising. The result is ungrammatical.
Example
Next to (i), which is an ordinary case of subject raising, (ii) is impossible, since the subject position taken by it is skipped in moving Vitesse to the subject position of seems.
(i) Vitesse seems [t to win] (ii) *Vitesse seems [that it is certain [t to win]]
Links
References
- Chomsky, N. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: the framework, MIT working papers in linguistics.
- Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London.
- Chomsky, N. 1986b. Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
