Difference between revisions of "Tensed-S Condition"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
'''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsky (1973). It states that [[extraction]] out of a tensed sentence is impossible, and is formulated as | '''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsky (1973). It states that [[extraction]] out of a tensed sentence is impossible, and is formulated as | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
where a is a tensed sentence | where a is a tensed sentence | ||
| − | + | == Example == | |
| − | |||
The TSC accounts for the contrast in (i) and (ii). In (i) passivization involves NP-movement out of an infinitival (i.e. non-tensed) clause, while in (ii) the same NP is moved out of the tensed counterpart, violating the TSC. | The TSC accounts for the contrast in (i) and (ii). In (i) passivization involves NP-movement out of an infinitival (i.e. non-tensed) clause, while in (ii) the same NP is moved out of the tensed counterpart, violating the TSC. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
''Wh''-movement in (iii) can violate the TSC, because ''wh''-movement involves the COMP-position which (by definition) is an [[escape hatch]]. In later work the TSC has also been referred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions for anaphors (including NP-traces), through the definition of [[governing category]]. | ''Wh''-movement in (iii) can violate the TSC, because ''wh''-movement involves the COMP-position which (by definition) is an [[escape hatch]]. In later work the TSC has also been referred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions for anaphors (including NP-traces), through the definition of [[governing category]]. | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Tensed-S+Condition&lemmacode=145 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Tensed-S+Condition&lemmacode=145 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York. | * Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York. | ||
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht. | * Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
| − | {{stub}}{{cats | + | {{stub}}{{cats}} |
Latest revision as of 07:34, 17 August 2014
Definition
Tensed-S Condition (TSC) is one of the conditions on transformations proposed by Chomsky (1973). It states that extraction out of a tensed sentence is impossible, and is formulated as
No rule can involve X,Y in the structure ...X...[a...Y...]... where a is a tensed sentence
Example
The TSC accounts for the contrast in (i) and (ii). In (i) passivization involves NP-movement out of an infinitival (i.e. non-tensed) clause, while in (ii) the same NP is moved out of the tensed counterpart, violating the TSC.
(i) John is believed [t to be ill] (ii) *John is believed [(that) is ill] (iii) who do you believe [S' COMP [S I met t]]
Wh-movement in (iii) can violate the TSC, because wh-movement involves the COMP-position which (by definition) is an escape hatch. In later work the TSC has also been referred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the binding conditions for anaphors (including NP-traces), through the definition of governing category.
Links
References
- Chomsky, N. 1986a. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use, Praeger, New York.
- Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
- Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations, in: S.R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky, A festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
