Difference between revisions of "Operational plausibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(added See Also section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== | ||
Lamb, Sydney M. "Linguistic structure: A plausible theory" in <i>[http://www.ludjournal.org Language Under Discussion]</i>, published online June 2, 2016. | Lamb, Sydney M. "Linguistic structure: A plausible theory" in <i>[http://www.ludjournal.org Language Under Discussion]</i>, published online June 2, 2016. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===See also== | ||
| + | [[Developmental plausibility]] | ||
[[Category:En]] [[Category:DICT]] | [[Category:En]] [[Category:DICT]] | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 13 April 2017
The fact that people are able to speak and write, and to comprehend texts (if often imperfectly), assures us that linguistic systems are able to operate for producing and comprehending texts. Therefore, a model of "linguistic structure" cannot be considered realistic if it cannot be put into operation in a realistic way. This principle, the requirement of operational plausibility, has also been mentioned by Ray Jackendoff (2002).
Source
Lamb, Sydney M. "Linguistic structure: A plausible theory" in Language Under Discussion, published online June 2, 2016.
