Difference between revisions of "Formative"
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The term ''formative'' was introduced by Karl Brugmann (see Brugmann 1908), as a replacement for ''suffix'', which he thought had unwanted diachronic connotations (Latin ''suffixum'' originally means 'attached element' and might suggest that such an element arose from a previously free word by diachronic aglutination). | The term ''formative'' was introduced by Karl Brugmann (see Brugmann 1908), as a replacement for ''suffix'', which he thought had unwanted diachronic connotations (Latin ''suffixum'' originally means 'attached element' and might suggest that such an element arose from a previously free word by diachronic aglutination). | ||
| − | === | + | ===References=== |
*Brugmann, Karl. 1908. Formans oder Formativum? ''Indogermanische Forschungen'' 22:69-72. | *Brugmann, Karl. 1908. Formans oder Formativum? ''Indogermanische Forschungen'' 22:69-72. | ||
*{{:Chomsky & Halle 1968}} | *{{:Chomsky & Halle 1968}} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:21, 11 January 2008
A formative is a exponent of a morpheme. Formatives comprise not anly affixes, phrasal affixes and particles but also non-concatenative changes like umlaut, tone or stress change, deletion of one or more segments, consonant mutation and the like.
The term became well-known in the 1960s through its use in Chomsky & Halle (1968).
Examples
English plural morpheme is the formative -s like in cat-s (cat+PL).
One of the German plural morphemes consist of the formative -e plus the umlaut of the stem vowel like in Stühl-e (Stuhl+PL) ‘chairs’. (Such morphemes are called simulfixes.)
A circumfix can be seen as consisting of two formatives: a prefix and a suffix.
The German clause negation particle nicht is a formative. Despite its syntactical separation from V0 grammatically (morphologically) it is a part of the verb inflection.
Subtypes
Origin
The term formative was introduced by Karl Brugmann (see Brugmann 1908), as a replacement for suffix, which he thought had unwanted diachronic connotations (Latin suffixum originally means 'attached element' and might suggest that such an element arose from a previously free word by diachronic aglutination).
References
- Brugmann, Karl. 1908. Formans oder Formativum? Indogermanische Forschungen 22:69-72.
- Chomsky, Noam A. & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
other languages
German Formativ
