Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Feature value" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
- '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
- In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
- '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
- [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
- {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
- ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
- A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
- '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
- '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
- 139 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 29 June 2014
- ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
- Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
Page text matches
- '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
- '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
- ...g goal, i.e. a category Y with a matching (e.g. identical or non-distinct) feature F’. Matching of probe-goal induces Agree, a relation eliminating the unin530 bytes (81 words) - 16:14, 21 January 2008
- ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
- ...ract; the air pressure is built up inside the cavity. Obstruents share the feature [-son]. ...e feature theory]], obstruents are represented with the minus-value of the feature [son] or [sonorant].827 bytes (119 words) - 10:22, 18 February 2009
- ...on a map to mark the boundary of an area in which a particular linguistic feature is used. A number (or [[bundle]]) of isoglosses falling together in one pla The term is also used figuratively for the feature itself.502 bytes (75 words) - 21:13, 15 February 2009
- ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...h a matching ([[uninterpretable]]) feature F', deletes the uninterpretable feature F' in B. If F in A is uninterpretable, F is also deleted. ...movement is supposed to exist independently, for functional reasons, and [[feature checking]] is considered to be one of the mechanisms that can implement mov1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
- ...tor''' is the uninterpretable (inherent) feature which attracts a matching feature (in order to be deleted).346 bytes (44 words) - 17:04, 20 September 2014
- In the [[Minimalist Program]] (Chomsky 1995), a '''sublabel''' is a feature associated with a [[label]]. ...le, the EPP-feature forces movement of the subject to spec,T, and the [-V]-feature forces movement of the verb to T. The features of heads that are adjoined t993 bytes (142 words) - 13:52, 7 October 2007
- ...is defined as follows: A target K attracts a feature F if F is the closest feature that can enter into a [[checking relation]] with a [[sublabel]] of K (Choms ...he [[functional head]] that attracts, can only attract in order to check a feature of its own. So it is not the moved element that is greedy, but the function2 KB (269 words) - 04:44, 7 October 2007
- ...way, applying the [[ECP]] means checking whether an empty category has the feature [+gamma] at LF.921 bytes (131 words) - 22:31, 15 February 2009
- ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
- (i) The head<sub>F</sub> (= head with respect to the feature F) of a word is the rightmost element of the word marked for the feature F2 KB (289 words) - 18:08, 28 September 2014
- ...used as a [[feature]] in the classification of speech sounds; see [[voice (feature)]]478 bytes (65 words) - 09:37, 25 September 2007
- '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
- Generally speaking, '''binarity''' relates to the fact that exactly two [[value]]s are available for a given choice or decision. ...inary iff it can take only one of two [[value]]s. For example, the lexical feature [concrete] can only assume the values [+ concrete] and [- concrete].595 bytes (94 words) - 13:16, 14 June 2009