Lexicalization (in neurocognitive linguistics)
LEXICALIZATION (in Neurocognitive Linguistics) ‘Lexicalization’ in the title of the paper can be clarified by reference to Lamb (1999:163–70, 179, 271), together with information about the frequency of occur- rence of particular English words. Lamb notes (163) that even though a word such as hap- piness can be understood on the basis of the meanings of its constituent morphemes, the frequency with which this combination occurs is such that the lexicon of the typical speaker will contain not just the separate lexemes happy and -ness but also a complex lexeme happi- ness. Moreover, for this to be the case it is unnecessary for the meaning of happiness to be in any way idiomatic: ‘it is repeated use rather than degree of idiomaticity that determines presence or absence of a higher-level lexical [node]’ (165, 271). Furthermore, the more fre- quently any part of the linguistic network (or wider cognitive network) is used, the easier it is to use it again: ‘The pathways of the brain are like pathways through a meadow or field or jungle—the more they are used the easier they become to use again’ (179). In formalizing this phenomenon in Relational network Grammar (rng), lines of different strengths are used (e.g. they are drawn with different thicknesses) and it is assumed that the strengths of the lines corresponding to frequently used items will increase over time. A Google search on the words happy, happiness, full and fullness, carried out on July 5, 2005, revealed that while the word happiness was only 7 times less frequent than happy, fullness was 443 times less frequent than full. If these figures are representative of a typical speaker’s receptive and productive experience with the words in question, it seems reasonable to assume that he/ she might either have no single node corresponding to the word fullness or, at least, that its connections would be rather weak compared with those of happiness. ~LACUS Forum XXXIII THE EVoLUTIon oF CLITIC SySTEMS: A LEXICALIZATIon EXPLAnATIon David C. Bennett SOAS, University of London, 2009.
