Difference between revisions of "Actant"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''actant''' is the same as a syntactic [[argument]], i.e. a [[noun phrase]] (or other referential constituent) that is required by a [[verb]]'s [[valency]].
+
An '''actant''' is the same as a dependent syntactic [[argument]], i.e. a [[noun phrase]] (or other referential constituent) that is required by a [[valency]] of a [[predicate]].
  
 
===Comments===
 
===Comments===
The term ''actant'' goes back to Tesnière (1959) and has been fairly common especially in European linguistics since the 1970s. However, the synonym [[argument]] is becoming more and more common.
+
*The term ''actant'' goes back to Tesnière (1959) and has been fairly common especially in European linguistics since the 1970s. However, the quasi-synonym [[argument]] is becoming more and more common.
 +
**There is a slight difference between the notions of '''actant''' and '''argument'''. I.e., in attributive phrases (derived as a result of [[adjectivization]]) the determined constituent is an '''argument''' of its modifier, but not an '''actant''' of it.
  
In Tesnière's terminology, actants are opposed to [[circumstant]]s, i.e. optional modifiers of the clause.
+
*In Tesnière's terminology, actants are opposed to [[circumstant]]s, i.e. optional modifiers of the clause.
 +
 
 +
*The main subtypes of actants are [[subject]] (= [[first actant]])and [[object]]s ([[non-first actant]]s).
 +
*There is some difference between [[semantic actants]] and [[syntactic actants]]. E.g.:
 +
**(1) some syntactic actants, like "dummy subjects" (like ''it'' in Engl. ''It rains.''), correspond to no semantic actant.
 +
**(2) some semantic actants, like "zero" object ('on what?') in Engl. ''It depends.'', correspond to no syntactic actant.  
  
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===

Revision as of 21:40, 4 August 2007

An actant is the same as a dependent syntactic argument, i.e. a noun phrase (or other referential constituent) that is required by a valency of a predicate.

Comments

  • The term actant goes back to Tesnière (1959) and has been fairly common especially in European linguistics since the 1970s. However, the quasi-synonym argument is becoming more and more common.
    • There is a slight difference between the notions of actant and argument. I.e., in attributive phrases (derived as a result of adjectivization) the determined constituent is an argument of its modifier, but not an actant of it.
  • In Tesnière's terminology, actants are opposed to circumstants, i.e. optional modifiers of the clause.
  • The main subtypes of actants are subject (= first actant)and objects (non-first actants).
  • There is some difference between semantic actants and syntactic actants. E.g.:
    • (1) some syntactic actants, like "dummy subjects" (like it in Engl. It rains.), correspond to no semantic actant.
    • (2) some semantic actants, like "zero" object ('on what?') in Engl. It depends., correspond to no syntactic actant.

Reference

  • Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.

Other languages