Difference between revisions of "Affected vs. effected object"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Sp. translation)
Line 16: Line 16:
*German [[affiziertes vs. effiziertes Objekt]]
*German [[affiziertes vs. effiziertes Objekt]]
*Russian [[аффицируемый vs. эффицируемый объект]]
*Russian [[аффицируемый vs. эффицируемый объект]]
*Spanish [[objeto efecto vs. objeto afecto]]
*Spanish [[objeto afecto vs. objeto efecto]]
[[Category:Semantic role]]
[[Category:Semantic role]]

Latest revision as of 11:09, 21 January 2011

A relatively old semantic-role distinction is that between affected objects, i.e. patients which are affected by the verbal action, and effected objects, i.e. participants which come into being as a result of the verbal action.

  • “One example of a ‘covert’ grammatical distinction is the one to which traditional grammarians have attached the labels ‘affectum’ and ‘effectum’, in German ‘affiziertes Objekt’ and ‘effiziertes Objekt’. The distinction, which is reportedly made overt in some languages, can be seen in Sentences 1 and 2. 1. John ruined the table. 2. John built the table. Note that in one case the object is understood as existing antecedently to John's activities, while in the other case its existence resulted from John's activities." (Fillmore 1968:4)


  • affected objects: open the door, paint the house, destroy a house
  • effected objects: paint a painting, build a house, draw a line


  • affectum object vs. effectum object (Fillmore 1968:4)


  • Charles J. Fillmore 1968. The case for case. In: Bach, Emmon & Harms, R.T. (eds.) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1-88.

Other languages