Search results

Create the page "Feature value" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• EPP feature
  ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
• L-feature
  '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
• Feature
  In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].
  4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
• Feature checking
  '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').
  588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Weak feature
  [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
• Strong feature
  [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
• Semantic feature
  {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}
  97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
• Rule feature
  ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
• Feature matrix
  A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.
  648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
• Feature percolation
  '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan
  1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Diacritic feature
  '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.
  1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
• Feature percolation conventions
  '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
• Feature instantiation principles
  139 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 29 June 2014
• Feature specification defaults
  ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions
  ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
  1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Feature specification defaults (de)
  Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati
  943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)
  ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014

Page text matches

• Feature checking
  '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').
  588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Feature matrix
  A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.
  648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
• L-feature
  '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
• Active
  ...g goal, i.e. a category Y with a matching (e.g. identical or non-distinct) feature F’. Matching of probe-goal induces Agree, a relation eliminating the unin
  530 bytes (81 words) - 16:14, 21 January 2008
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions
  ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
  1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Obstruent
  ...ract; the air pressure is built up inside the cavity. Obstruents share the feature [-son]. ...e feature theory]], obstruents are represented with the minus-value of the feature [son] or [sonorant].
  827 bytes (119 words) - 10:22, 18 February 2009
• Isogloss
  ...on a map to mark the boundary of an area in which a particular linguistic feature is used. A number (or [[bundle]]) of isoglosses falling together in one pla The term is also used figuratively for the feature itself.
  502 bytes (75 words) - 21:13, 15 February 2009
• Feature specification defaults
  ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Checking theory
  ...h a matching ([[uninterpretable]]) feature F', deletes the uninterpretable feature F' in B. If F in A is uninterpretable, F is also deleted. ...movement is supposed to exist independently, for functional reasons, and [[feature checking]] is considered to be one of the mechanisms that can implement mov
  1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
• Attractor
  ...tor''' is the uninterpretable (inherent) feature which attracts a matching feature (in order to be deleted).
  346 bytes (44 words) - 17:04, 20 September 2014
• Sublabel
  In the [[Minimalist Program]] (Chomsky 1995), a '''sublabel''' is a feature associated with a [[label]]. ...le, the EPP-feature forces movement of the subject to spec,T, and the [-V]-feature forces movement of the verb to T. The features of heads that are adjoined t
  993 bytes (142 words) - 13:52, 7 October 2007
• Attract
  ...is defined as follows: A target K attracts a feature F if F is the closest feature that can enter into a [[checking relation]] with a [[sublabel]] of K (Choms ...he [[functional head]] that attracts, can only attract in order to check a feature of its own. So it is not the moved element that is greedy, but the function
  2 KB (269 words) - 04:44, 7 October 2007
• Gamma-marking
  ...way, applying the [[ECP]] means checking whether an empty category has the feature [+gamma] at LF.
  921 bytes (131 words) - 22:31, 15 February 2009
• EPP feature
  ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
• Relativized head
  (i) The head_F (= head with respect to the feature F) of a word is the rightmost element of the word marked for the feature F
  2 KB (289 words) - 18:08, 28 September 2014
• Voice
  ...used as a [[feature]] in the classification of speech sounds; see [[voice (feature)]]
  478 bytes (65 words) - 09:37, 25 September 2007
• Feature percolation
  '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan
  1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Diacritic feature
  '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.
  1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
• Binarity
  Generally speaking, '''binarity''' relates to the fact that exactly two [[value]]s are available for a given choice or decision. ...inary iff it can take only one of two [[value]]s. For example, the lexical feature [concrete] can only assume the values [+ concrete] and [- concrete].
  595 bytes (94 words) - 13:16, 14 June 2009
• Feature specification defaults (de)
  Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati
  943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Rule feature
  ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
• Affective (context)
  The term '''affective''' was used by Klima (1964) as denoting a property ('feature') of constituents that license [[Negative polarity item]]s. ...''Quant''(''ifier'') in construction with a constituent that contains the feature ''Affect''(''ive'') may ultimately appear as an indefinite."'' (Klima 1964:
  741 bytes (104 words) - 08:35, 9 September 2009
• Absorption
  ...lly assigned to such an element, it is said that this element absorbs that feature.
  960 bytes (142 words) - 12:55, 17 January 2008
• L-related
  ...i.e. in the [[internal domain]] or [[checking domain]] of a head with an L-feature. Those L-related positions in a checking domain which are adjoined position
  753 bytes (105 words) - 17:35, 15 February 2009
• Checking configuration
  ...ature F1 located on a [[head]] X is in a '''checking configuration''' with feature F2 located on [[head]] Y, if Y is [[adjoined]] to X, or YP is in a [[specif
  639 bytes (98 words) - 04:45, 7 October 2007
• Projection Principle
  ...presentations at each level of representation are [[projection]]s of the [[feature]]s of [[lexical item]]s, notably their [[subcategorization]] features, and # if F is a lexical feature, it is projected at each syntactic level of representation ([[D-structure]]
  1 KB (174 words) - 12:56, 20 February 2009
• Window model
  ...and/or in height) in case the segment is specified + or - for a particular feature, and broad in case the segment is specified neutrally. This means that + or
  2 KB (246 words) - 15:28, 7 September 2014
• No Vacuous Application Principle
  ...ven [[feature value]] cannot attach to a [[stem]] bearing the same feature value. Marantz assumes that affixes are lexical items which have subcategorizatio
  1 KB (186 words) - 19:49, 17 February 2009
• Pitch accent (lexical)
  ..., Norwegian, and Serbo-Croatian. In the other sense...it refers to a pitch feature (normally a localised pitch movement) associated with a prominent syllable: [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]
  1 KB (168 words) - 11:14, 9 September 2007
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)
  ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Generalisierte Phrasenstrukturgrammatik
  Viele Konzepte der GPSG (ID/LP-Format, head feature convention) wurden von der [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] (kurz: * [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  2 KB (234 words) - 07:39, 14 April 2011
• Apical
  Phonemes produced with the tip of the tongue are '''apical'''. The [[feature]] involved is [[coronal]].
  292 bytes (39 words) - 17:00, 20 September 2014
• Merkmalsinstantiierungsprinzipien
  * Englisch [[Feature instantiation principles]]
  114 bytes (10 words) - 10:53, 20 February 2009
• Semantic feature
  {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}
  97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
• Adaptation
  ...ntation of one of the stimuli could be explained by the fatigue of certain feature detectors rather than as a [[criterion shift]] (Eimas & Corbit, 1973). *Eimas, P.D. & J.D. Corbit. 1973. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. ''Cognitive Psychology 4'', 99-109.
  2 KB (359 words) - 17:17, 15 February 2009
• High (sound)
  '''High''' is a feature which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue body fro
  533 bytes (81 words) - 15:57, 15 February 2009
• Voiceless
  [[Category:Segmental feature]]
  274 bytes (38 words) - 19:37, 2 August 2014
• Sonorant
  '''Sonorant''' is a [[phonological feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced in such a way that the [
  404 bytes (57 words) - 07:48, 3 November 2014
• Primary stress
  [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]
  293 bytes (36 words) - 19:28, 20 July 2014
• Continuant
  In phonetics and phonology, a '''continuant''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[phoneme]]s that are produced without complete closu
  502 bytes (70 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
• Feature
  In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].
  4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
• Consonantal
  In phonology. '''consonantal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced with an [[obstruction]] or a
  483 bytes (63 words) - 13:13, 14 May 2008
• Realization
  ...um. Just as we don't find any feature which is in some context a semantic feature and in another a phonological, so don't we find that kind of thing between
  1 KB (181 words) - 06:05, 8 October 2017
• Coronal
  In phonology and phonetics, '''coronal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue blade
  518 bytes (76 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
• Lateral
  '''Lateral''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by raising the mid secti
  672 bytes (102 words) - 20:05, 16 February 2009
• Round
  '''Round''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by rounding the [[lips]]
  408 bytes (53 words) - 14:51, 5 October 2014
• Low
  '''Low''' is a phonological [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by lowering the [[body]]
  601 bytes (84 words) - 10:12, 17 February 2009
• Portal:Phonetics and phonology
  ...[[extrametricality]], [[extrasyllabicity]], [[feature (in phonology)]], [[feature geometry]], [[fricative]], [[geminate]], [[government phonology]], [[h-aspi
  2 KB (198 words) - 06:31, 28 October 2007
• Deletion
  '''Deletion''' is the erasing of (at least) the phonological [[feature]]s of an element in a representation. In early versions of [[generative gra
  774 bytes (108 words) - 18:43, 12 February 2009

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)