Search results

Create the page "Category-neutral rule" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• LP-rule
  LP-rules restrict the set of local trees admitted by an ID-rule. An LD-rule ''X'' <math>\prec</math> ''Y'' states that category ''X'' has to precede ca * [[ID-rule]]
  665 bytes (92 words) - 17:08, 6 July 2014
• ID/LP rules
  ...(GPSG) uses [[ID-rule|ID-rules]] (''immediate dominance rules'') and [[LP-rule|LP-rules]] (''linear precedence rules'') instead of context-free phrase str ...nterpreted as well-formedness conditions for [[local tree|local trees]]. A rule like ''X'' <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>Y_1</math> <math>Y_2</math> ... <
  2 KB (278 words) - 20:45, 3 July 2014
• Underspecification
  ...n all other contexts. See [[Structure preservation]], [[structure-building rule]].
  1,006 bytes (134 words) - 21:45, 7 February 2021
• Readjustment rule
  ...by Chomsky &amp; Halle (1968) to modify the output of the [[word formation rule]]s or the output of the syntactic rules before these structures enter the p [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Readjustment+rule&lemmacode=314 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  939 bytes (130 words) - 08:26, 28 September 2014
• Transformational rule
  '''Transformational rule''' is a [[rule]] that transforms [[syntactic structure]]. [[Deletion]], Insertion, and [[m *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Transformational+rule&lemmacode=187 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  662 bytes (84 words) - 19:48, 29 August 2014
• Structure preservation
  A rule or rule system is structure preserving if its output is independently available as ...ng, but characteristically this rule does not effect sonorants. Hence, the rule of final devoicing is structure preserving.
  1 KB (207 words) - 09:11, 10 August 2014
• A-over-A
  ...t if a rule ambiguously refers to A in a structure of the form of (i), the rule must apply to the higher, more inclusive, node A (Chomsky 1964).
  1 KB (171 words) - 17:03, 6 February 2008
• ID-rule
  An ID-rule ''X'' <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>Y_1,</math> <math>Y_2,</math> ..., <ma * [[LP-rule]]
  890 bytes (124 words) - 20:42, 3 July 2014
• Adjacency Condition
  ...gical rule. Intuitively, the Adjacency Condition prevents a word formation rule from looking into the entire derivational history of morphologically comple ...ub>A</sub>''), and the Adjacency Condition makes the ''-baar'' suffixation rule insensitive to the intransitive nature of the [[verb]] ''klimmen''.
  2 KB (315 words) - 15:17, 22 January 2008
• Separation hypothesis
  ...separated from their [[function]]. Beard distinguishes [[L-rule]]s and [[M-rule]]s, and assumes that L-rules are grammatical processes which change or add ...he chance of giving phonological content to the function supplied by the L-rule.
  2 KB (267 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
• Lexical category prominence
  .... [[feet]] (=F)) that consist of syllables. The main part of this labeling rule in English states that in a configuration [A B], B is labeled strong if and
  1 KB (195 words) - 20:24, 16 February 2009
• Sound change
  ...called a [[sound law]] or a [[phonetical rule]]. Exceptions to the law or rule can normally be explained by analogy. Some important sound laws were descri
  778 bytes (111 words) - 14:57, 27 July 2014
• Phrase structure rules
  Thus the phrase structure rule in (ii)a characterizes a sentence (S) as the combination of an NP (the subj ...ule in (ii)b gives the internal structure of the [[VP]]. According to this rule, a verbal phrase consists of a verb and, optionally, an [[NP]] and a [[PP]]
  3 KB (514 words) - 20:58, 19 February 2009
• Feature specification defaults
  ...category which are not determined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). ...instantiated in any lexical category; i.e. it has to be licenced by an ID-rule or an lexical entry.
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Metarules
  ...o generate for each VP-rule introducing a transitive verb a new lexical ID rule which introduces a passive verb form accompanied by the same phrases, excep
  1 KB (200 words) - 10:00, 14 February 2008
• Diphthongization
  '''Diphthongization''' is a [[phonological rule]] involving a change from a [[monophtong]] to a [[diphthong]].
  450 bytes (56 words) - 20:44, 12 February 2009
• Generate
  ...ules starting with applying a rule to the start symbol and each successive rule being applied to the output of the former, until no auxiliary symbols remai
  1 KB (226 words) - 15:30, 15 February 2009
• Global economy
  It will rule out (ii), because the link between the wh-element and its trace is longer i The local version of the MLC will rule out the derivation with movement of ''what'' right at this point in the der
  2 KB (277 words) - 15:36, 15 February 2009
• Extrinsische Regelordnung
  *Pelletier, F. J. 1980. The Generative Power of Rule Orderings in Formal Grammars. ''Linguistics'' 18, 17–72. Englisch [[extrinsic rule order]]
  2 KB (191 words) - 19:32, 17 October 2007
• Derivative
  A '''derivative''' is a [[lexeme]] that is related to another lexeme by a rule of [[derivation]].
  274 bytes (36 words) - 18:05, 28 June 2014
• Atom Condition
  ...is Atom Condition, Williams is able to account for the fact the affixation rule which attaches ''-ion'' can (indirectly) refer to the root features.
  2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
• Allophony
  ...The differences between the allophones can be expressed by [[phonological rule]]s.
  616 bytes (86 words) - 15:53, 28 January 2008
• Surface structure
  ...ived from Deep structure ( [[D-structure]]) by means of [[transformational rule]]s. Also [[S-structure]].
  455 bytes (55 words) - 08:20, 16 August 2014
• Head
  ...d. This generalization lies at the heart of the so-called [[Righthand Head Rule]]. ...thstand''. Also see [[relativized head]], and [[Relativized Righthand Head Rule]].
  2 KB (295 words) - 15:55, 15 February 2009
• Psych-movement
  '''Psych-movement''' is a rule which is similar to [[passive]], in that it [[move]]s the [[object]] of a [
  639 bytes (89 words) - 13:17, 20 February 2009
• Braces
  Braces are a means to abbreviate the rules (i) and (ii) as the one rule (iii).
  514 bytes (70 words) - 15:38, 20 April 2008
• Insert alpha
  ...x]], '''insert alpha''' is an instance of the general [[transformation]]al rule [[affect alpha]]. Few rules that insert material in the course of a derivat
  619 bytes (81 words) - 22:25, 15 February 2009
• Pronominalization (in generative grammar)
  ...to account for the occurrence of anaphoric pronouns by a transformational rule.
  516 bytes (66 words) - 17:32, 30 January 2009
• Morpheme-based morphology
  ...heory it is assumed that new words are formed by applying a word formation rule to a single already existing word. Both the new word and the existing one a ...d morphology the words in (i) cannot be formed by a regular word formation rule. In a morpheme-based morphology, on the other hand, it is allowed to genera
  2 KB (301 words) - 19:12, 17 February 2009
• Base component
  ...mar in which [[D-structure]]s are generated by means of [[phrase structure rule]]s and the [[Projection Principle]], on the basis of information from the [
  450 bytes (63 words) - 17:06, 15 June 2014
• Cyclicity
  ...ounding nodes. Originally, cyclicity was considered a property of rules or rule systems: a set of rules are to be applied cyclically to successively larger
  825 bytes (112 words) - 18:12, 22 May 2008
• Morphologization
  ...n the context of the affixal front-vowel ''i'', changed to a morphological rule which led to umlaut-formation in plural-contexts. This strategy has been de
  2 KB (343 words) - 16:21, 29 October 2007
• Superiority condition
  No rule can involve X,Y in the structure where the rule applies ambiguously to Z and Y
  2 KB (236 words) - 08:16, 16 August 2014
• IS A Condition
  ...he Is A Condition is the predecessor of Williams' (1981a) [[Righthand Head Rule]].
  857 bytes (128 words) - 16:11, 15 February 2009
• Lexicalization
  ...uming that lexicalization eradicates internal boundaries, the phonological rule FINAL DEVOICING cannot apply in the lexicalized form.
  1 KB (168 words) - 20:53, 16 February 2009
• Crossover
  ...ioned in the structural index of a transformation may be reordered by that rule in such a way as to cross over a co-referential NP.'' (Ross 1967:73)
  1 KB (165 words) - 16:02, 22 May 2008
• S-structure
  ...level of representation derived from [[d-structure]] by [[transformational rule]]s, and input to the rules deriving [[PF]] and [[LF]]. S-structure is the [
  610 bytes (78 words) - 15:56, 5 October 2014
• Escape hatch
  No rule can invoke X,Y in the structure
  1 KB (191 words) - 17:04, 13 February 2009
• Extrametricality
  ...re not there. Hayes (1982) argues that extrametricality can be assigned by rule and is subject to the [[Peripherality Condition]]<nowiki>: extrametrical el
  2 KB (266 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2019
• Blocking
  ...tal dictionary, prevents the application of an unproductive word formation rule, if that application would give rise to a complex word having the same sema
  1 KB (167 words) - 15:05, 23 March 2008
• Lexicon
  ...a word which can be predicted by phonological, morphological, or syntactic rule will therefore be excluded from the lexicon. In this approach the lexicon i ...ation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''op
  3 KB (472 words) - 09:02, 26 May 2013
• Expletive infixation
  ...e term '''expletive infixation''' is sometimes used for the [[infixation]] rule that allows speakers to insert an expletive word (i.e. a rude word such as
  1,009 bytes (122 words) - 16:47, 25 January 2009
• Bare argument ellipsis
  :::*''“...a rule that deletes everything in a clause under identity with corresponding parts
  1 KB (152 words) - 14:07, 18 September 2008
• Morpheme Structure Condition
  ...logical shape of morphemes are sometimes expressed by lexical [[redundancy rule]]s.
  1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
• Right node raising
  * Postal, P.M. 1974. ''On Raising. One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications,'' The MIT Press: Cambr
  893 bytes (135 words) - 18:19, 28 September 2014
• Derivation
  ...generative syntax|generative syntax]], it refers to the entire sequence of rule applications in the process of generating a terminal string on the basis of
  954 bytes (131 words) - 18:03, 28 June 2014
• Allomorph
  The rule is as follows:
  885 bytes (130 words) - 17:17, 18 June 2014
• No Phrase Constraint
  *[[Botha, Rudolf]]. 1981. “A Base Rule Theory of Afrikaans Synthetic Compounding”. In: ''The Scope of Lexical Ru
  902 bytes (131 words) - 16:13, 8 July 2009
• Loop
  ...level]] (or [[stratum]]) n-1 after the application of the [[word formation rule]]s of level/stratum n.
  1 KB (213 words) - 10:14, 17 February 2009
• Swedish
  * Sydsvenska mål: was under Danish rule until 1658; spoken in Skåne, Blekinge, boarderlands of Halland and souther
  5 KB (658 words) - 11:34, 2 March 2018

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)