Difference between revisions of "Trace theory"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (utrecht)
 
(Removed the block {{format}})
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Definition==
 
'''Trace theory''' is theory about traces left by [[movement]]. This theory assumes that if an element X has been moved in the course of a derivation, it has left a [[trace]] in its original position.
 
'''Trace theory''' is theory about traces left by [[movement]]. This theory assumes that if an element X has been moved in the course of a derivation, it has left a [[trace]] in its original position.
  
=== Example ===
+
== Example ==
 
+
In (i) the NP ''John'' is moved while leaving a trace t, indicating its [[d-structure]] position.
in (i) the NP ''John'' is moved while leaving a trace t, indicating its [[d-structure]] position.
 
  
 
  (i) John<sub>i </sub>seems [t<sub>i </sub>to have left]
 
  (i) John<sub>i </sub>seems [t<sub>i </sub>to have left]
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Since [[theta-marking]] occurs at d-structure, it is possible to determine the thematic role of the moved NP via its trace. The concept of a trace is crucial to the theory of movement and to [[bounding theory]], because a trace can be treated as an [[empty category]]. See [[NP-trace]], [[wh-trace]].
 
Since [[theta-marking]] occurs at d-structure, it is possible to determine the thematic role of the moved NP via its trace. The concept of a trace is crucial to the theory of movement and to [[bounding theory]], because a trace can be treated as an [[empty category]]. See [[NP-trace]], [[wh-trace]].
  
=== Links ===
+
== Links ==
 
+
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Trace+theory&lemmacode=184 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Trace+theory&lemmacode=184 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
 
 
=== References ===
 
  
 +
== References ==
 
* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
Line 23: Line 21:
 
[[Category:Syntax]]
 
[[Category:Syntax]]
  
{{stub}}{{cats}}{{format}}
+
{{stub}}{{cats}}

Latest revision as of 19:46, 29 August 2014

Definition

Trace theory is theory about traces left by movement. This theory assumes that if an element X has been moved in the course of a derivation, it has left a trace in its original position.

Example

In (i) the NP John is moved while leaving a trace t, indicating its d-structure position.

(i) Johni seems [ti to have left]

Since theta-marking occurs at d-structure, it is possible to determine the thematic role of the moved NP via its trace. The concept of a trace is crucial to the theory of movement and to bounding theory, because a trace can be treated as an empty category. See NP-trace, wh-trace.

Links

References

  • Chomsky, N. 1986a. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use, Praeger, New York.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
  • Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations, in: S.R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky, A festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
  • Riemsdijk, H. van and E. Williams 1986. Introduction to the theory of grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
STUB
CAT This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it
Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed.