Difference between revisions of "Verb-framing vs. satellite-framing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) (New page: The terms '''verb-framing''' and '''satellite-framing''' are used for two different types of languages or constructions (Talmy 1985): In '''verb-framed''' constructions, information about ...) |
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (cats) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{cats}} | ||
| + | |||
The terms '''verb-framing''' and '''satellite-framing''' are used for two different types of languages or constructions (Talmy 1985): In '''verb-framed''' constructions, information about a path of movement is expressed in a verb (e.g. ''exit, enter, pass''), whereas in '''satellite-framed''' constructions, information about a path is expressed outside the verb (by s [[satellite (in Talmy's typology)|satellite]]), e.g. by adverbial particles (''out, in, past''). | The terms '''verb-framing''' and '''satellite-framing''' are used for two different types of languages or constructions (Talmy 1985): In '''verb-framed''' constructions, information about a path of movement is expressed in a verb (e.g. ''exit, enter, pass''), whereas in '''satellite-framed''' constructions, information about a path is expressed outside the verb (by s [[satellite (in Talmy's typology)|satellite]]), e.g. by adverbial particles (''out, in, past''). | ||
Latest revision as of 12:14, 18 February 2009
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
The terms verb-framing and satellite-framing are used for two different types of languages or constructions (Talmy 1985): In verb-framed constructions, information about a path of movement is expressed in a verb (e.g. exit, enter, pass), whereas in satellite-framed constructions, information about a path is expressed outside the verb (by s satellite), e.g. by adverbial particles (out, in, past).
Origin
These terms were not used in Talmy's seminal 1985 article, but have only been introduced in later work (Talmy 1991).
References
- Slobin, Dan. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology & the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven eds. Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2, 219-257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
- Talmy, Len. 1985. Lexicalization patterns.
- Talmy, Len. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 480-519.
- Talmy, Len. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. Volume 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
