Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • '''Condition A''' is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+A&lemmacode=907 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    272 bytes (37 words) - 17:26, 20 September 2014
  • Condition B is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+B&lemmacode=908 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • Condition C is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+C&lemmacode=909 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • ...ested dependencies, such as the [[Subject condition]] and the [[ECP]]. The condition states that if two paths overlap, one must contain the other. The following [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Path+Containment+Condition&lemmacode=386 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:51, 19 February 2009
  • '''Morpheme Structure Condition (MSC)''' is a condition which expresses regularities about the [[phonological structure]] of [[morp [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morpheme+Structure+Condition+(MSC)&lemmacode=564 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • ...Move''. In the [[Minimalist Program]], the MLC accounts for [[superiority condition]] effects, [[wh-island]]s, and [[super raising]]. In chapter 4 of the Minim [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Minimal+Link+Condition&lemmacode=1527 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    589 bytes (81 words) - 18:23, 17 February 2009
  • '''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsk ...erred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions
    2 KB (253 words) - 07:34, 17 August 2014
  • In linguistics, '''condition on extraction domain''' is a condition of [[bounding theory]] formulated in Huang (1982) which restricts the class It includes the [[Subject Condition]] and the [[Adjunct Condition]].
    560 bytes (73 words) - 09:19, 11 February 2009
  • '''First Order Projection Condition''' is a condition proposed in Selkirk (1982) which says that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=First+Order+Projection+Condition&lemmacode=748 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    2 KB (281 words) - 20:57, 13 February 2009
  • A syntactic condition that movement must target a c-commanding position. ...t NP can move to HAVE because movement is known to obey the Proper Binding Condition. In (i), V c-commands N, so the nominal root may move to the light verb as
    963 bytes (111 words) - 13:14, 28 July 2021
  • ...involve categories of both W(ord)-structure and S(entence)-structure. This condition rules out a syntactic analysis of inflection, such as (a) the Affix Hopping *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word+Structure+Autonomy+Condition&lemmacode=99 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (140 words) - 18:35, 7 September 2014

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT[[Morpheme Structure Condition]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • ...cy condition subsumes both the [[Complex NP Constraint]] and the [[Subject Condition]]. The main principle of bounding theory is the [[Subjacency condition]], which forbids movement across more than one [[bounding node]].
    2 KB (245 words) - 15:37, 20 April 2008
  • ...''himself'' can be coreferential with ''Bill'' in (apparent) violation of Condition A. The co-referentiality of (ii) is considered one of logophoricity.
    951 bytes (143 words) - 10:17, 17 February 2009
  • ...[[phrase]], or if it is a 'designated element'. Part of the recoverability condition is subsumed under the [[ECP]]. See [[deletion]].
    568 bytes (78 words) - 08:33, 28 September 2014
  • ...with that relation. The name '''crossover''' derives from Ross's Crossover Condition: This condition accounts for the ill-formedness of the following sentence: the [[NP]] ''whi
    1 KB (165 words) - 16:02, 22 May 2008
  • ...not have to obey the [[Tensed-S Condition]] (TSC) and [[Specified Subject Condition]] (SSC) when moving to the next higher COMP. Thus, COMP functions as an esc
    1 KB (191 words) - 17:04, 13 February 2009
  • '''Leftness condition''' is a [[condition]] proposed in [[Chomsky]] (1976) which states that a [[pronoun]] cannot be [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Leftness+condition&lemmacode=595 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    658 bytes (91 words) - 02:59, 6 August 2021
  • ...involve categories of both W(ord)-structure and S(entence)-structure. This condition rules out a syntactic analysis of inflection, such as (a) the Affix Hopping *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word+Structure+Autonomy+Condition&lemmacode=99 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (140 words) - 18:35, 7 September 2014
  • More recently, the case filter has been reduced to the [[visibility condition]]. [[chain condition]]
    893 bytes (131 words) - 16:46, 9 April 2008
  • ...''a'' and coindexing of ''a'' and ''i'' would not violate the [[i-within-i condition]]. Also: condition on bound variable pronouns proposed in Higginbotham (1980) which accounts f
    646 bytes (82 words) - 17:53, 12 June 2014
  • ...Thus, Siegel's (1978) [[Adjacency Condition]] or Williams' (1981a) [[Atom Condition]] can be reduced to the Bracket Erasure Convention. *Siegel, D. 1978. The Adjacency Condition and the Theory of Morphology. ''NELS VIII'', 189-197.
    2 KB (227 words) - 15:40, 20 April 2008
  • ...n be no ambiguity of [[government]]. The 'absolute' form of the Minimality Condition states that a [[projection]] of an intermediate head serves as a [[barrier] ...rriers for government when 'a projection' is chosen in (i). The Minimality Condition is intended to exclude ambiguity of government, meaning that barriers creat
    2 KB (350 words) - 07:49, 3 November 2007
  • ...e [[head]] of a [[chain]] to the foot of the chain. See [[Path Containment Condition]].
    311 bytes (47 words) - 16:52, 19 February 2009
  • ...[[Theta-position]] without [[Case]]. NP-traces are anaphors, hence obey [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]].
    330 bytes (44 words) - 19:35, 17 February 2009
  • '''Morpheme Structure Condition (MSC)''' is a condition which expresses regularities about the [[phonological structure]] of [[morp [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morpheme+Structure+Condition+(MSC)&lemmacode=564 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • '''Well-Formedness Condition''' (WFC) is a condition which governs the way the [[CV skeleton]] has to be associated with the [[m *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Well-Formedness+Condition&lemmacode=84 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    997 bytes (141 words) - 18:19, 4 September 2014
  • ...oposes five global economy conditions: [[Last Resort]], the [[Minimal Link Condition]], [[Fewest Steps]], [[Procrastinate]] and [[Greed]]. These conditions comp A global version of the Minimal Link Condition (MLC) would compare the following two derivations:
    2 KB (277 words) - 15:36, 15 February 2009
  • A syntactic condition that movement must target a c-commanding position. ...t NP can move to HAVE because movement is known to obey the Proper Binding Condition. In (i), V c-commands N, so the nominal root may move to the light verb as
    963 bytes (111 words) - 13:14, 28 July 2021
  • '''First Order Projection Condition''' is a condition proposed in Selkirk (1982) which says that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=First+Order+Projection+Condition&lemmacode=748 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    2 KB (281 words) - 20:57, 13 February 2009
  • '''Superiority condition''' is a condition on the application of [[transformation]]s, which states that, if a transfor ...y only once in deriving the [[s-structure]] of a sentence, the superiority condition predicts that in structure (i) ''what'' cannot be moved: ''who'' is superio
    2 KB (236 words) - 08:16, 16 August 2014
  • '''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsk ...erred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions
    2 KB (253 words) - 07:34, 17 August 2014
  • The '''Specified Subject Condition''' is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that: *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specified+Subject+Condition&lemmacode=243 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (196 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • '''Specificity Condition''' is a condition on [[movement]] which states that movement out of specific [[NP]]s leads to [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specificity+Condition&lemmacode=242 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (164 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • A verb expressing a meteorological condition, such as ''rain'' or ''snow'', which is a predicate either without an argum
    458 bytes (61 words) - 18:15, 4 September 2014
  • ...theory]]<nowiki>: since </nowiki>''her'' is a [[pronominal]] it must obey condition B which says that ''she'' may not locally [[bind]] ''her''. It is assumed t
    881 bytes (134 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2009
  • '''Right Roof Constraint''' is a condition on [[rightward movement]] first formulated by Ross (1967:185): This condition captures the fact that rightward movement is upward bounded, as the followi
    1 KB (208 words) - 18:24, 28 September 2014
  • This condition accounts for the ungrammaticality of the sentence:
    766 bytes (116 words) - 10:59, 6 May 2008
  • ...y's (1976) [[Leftness condition]], Higginbotham's (1980) [[Accessibility]] Condition, Safir's (1984) PCOB, Reinhart's (1983) S-Structure c-command requirement.
    2 KB (356 words) - 02:48, 6 August 2021
  • '''Licensing''' is a it has been proposed that [[well-formedness condition]]s on [[syntactic structure]] (esp. the principle of [[Full Interpretation]
    823 bytes (122 words) - 20:56, 16 February 2009
  • ...ential expressions. With respect to [[binding theory]], R-expressions obey condition C, which says that they must be [[A-free]]. This explains the illformedness
    1 KB (158 words) - 14:50, 20 February 2009
  • ...man'' and the pair behaves as a [[chain]] with regard to the [[visibility condition]].
    703 bytes (107 words) - 18:04, 19 April 2008
  • ...s important theoretical consequences have been drawn. It follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items.
    2 KB (216 words) - 08:50, 10 August 2014
  • ...bject Constraint falls under the [[Subject condition]] of Huang's (1982) [[Condition on Extraction Domain]].
    1 KB (200 words) - 18:56, 28 October 2014
  • ...ence, ''each other'' must be [[bound]] within this IP in compliance with [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]], and may not be coindexed with ''the girls'',
    1 KB (156 words) - 18:21, 17 February 2009
  • The second part of the constraint can now be subsumed under the [[Adjunct Condition]], given that [[extraposition]] is an adjunction operation.
    1 KB (185 words) - 22:40, 13 February 2009
  • '''Truth table''' is the device by which the [[truth condition]]s of a complex [[propositional formula]] can be represented. By means of t
    607 bytes (81 words) - 08:04, 30 August 2014
  • ...rty of being left upward monotone if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    997 bytes (161 words) - 20:09, 16 February 2009
  • ...tractability (Island conditions) are often designated as the [[Wh-island]] Condition, the [[Complex NP Constraint]] (CNPC), and the [[Coordinate Structure Const
    899 bytes (112 words) - 22:13, 15 February 2009
  • ...-marking is invoked to explain the [[Subject Condition]] and the [[Adjunct Condition]]. EXAMPLE: : only in (ii)a is ''who'' moved out of an L-marked phrase (=/=
    2 KB (252 words) - 07:15, 16 August 2014
  • [[P. Mecner]], The Recoverability Condition in Polish and German. Societas Linguistica Europaea 33rd Annual Meeting, Po Englisch [[recoverability]] (condition) <br>
    2 KB (217 words) - 20:04, 25 July 2014
  • '''Felicity condition''' is a convention regulating the appropriate use of [[performative]] utter [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Felicity+condition&lemmacode=746 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    672 bytes (94 words) - 03:37, 18 May 2009
  • ...S-structure is putatively defined by conditions such as the [[subjacency]] condition.
    610 bytes (78 words) - 15:56, 5 October 2014
  • ...logical languages are both seen as sets of sentences of which the [[truth condition]]s have to be specified relative to a [[model]], an abstract representation
    910 bytes (127 words) - 10:21, 17 February 2009
  • [[island condition]]
    1 KB (171 words) - 17:03, 6 February 2008
  • The notion of connectedness has been resolved under the [[Path Containment Condition]].
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:00, 9 May 2008
  • ...miner D is left downward monotone if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    1 KB (167 words) - 20:08, 16 February 2009
  • ...ametricality can be assigned by rule and is subject to the [[Peripherality Condition]]<nowiki>: extrametrical elements are always peripheral (found at one edge ...le of the noun ''párent'' is lost in the derived word by the Peripherality Condition and the stress rules reapply. Schematized in the grid:
    2 KB (266 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2019
  • ...lantic Treaty Organization'', ''First Order Principle'' and ''Free Element Condition'', respectively. Some [[Dutch]] examples are: ''TROS'', ''KNAV'' and ''DAF'
    1 KB (140 words) - 17:23, 12 February 2009
  • ...sh ''a/an'' allomorphs (''a book'' vs. ''an apple'') is handled by a Shape Condition.
    759 bytes (104 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
  • ...nals are marked as [+pronominal, -anaphoric], and are subject to Binding [[condition B]]. ..., his, him'' in (i)-(iii) are pronominals. With respect to binding theory, condition B states that pronominals may either be [[free]] (as in (i) and (ii)b), or
    2 KB (328 words) - 19:11, 27 September 2014

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)