Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Feature value" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
- '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
- In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
- '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
- [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
- {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
- ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
- A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
- '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
- '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
- 139 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 29 June 2014
- ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
- Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
Page text matches
- '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
- '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
- ...g goal, i.e. a category Y with a matching (e.g. identical or non-distinct) feature F’. Matching of probe-goal induces Agree, a relation eliminating the unin530 bytes (81 words) - 16:14, 21 January 2008
- ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
- ...ract; the air pressure is built up inside the cavity. Obstruents share the feature [-son]. ...e feature theory]], obstruents are represented with the minus-value of the feature [son] or [sonorant].827 bytes (119 words) - 10:22, 18 February 2009
- ...on a map to mark the boundary of an area in which a particular linguistic feature is used. A number (or [[bundle]]) of isoglosses falling together in one pla The term is also used figuratively for the feature itself.502 bytes (75 words) - 21:13, 15 February 2009
- ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...h a matching ([[uninterpretable]]) feature F', deletes the uninterpretable feature F' in B. If F in A is uninterpretable, F is also deleted. ...movement is supposed to exist independently, for functional reasons, and [[feature checking]] is considered to be one of the mechanisms that can implement mov1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
- ...tor''' is the uninterpretable (inherent) feature which attracts a matching feature (in order to be deleted).346 bytes (44 words) - 17:04, 20 September 2014
- In the [[Minimalist Program]] (Chomsky 1995), a '''sublabel''' is a feature associated with a [[label]]. ...le, the EPP-feature forces movement of the subject to spec,T, and the [-V]-feature forces movement of the verb to T. The features of heads that are adjoined t993 bytes (142 words) - 13:52, 7 October 2007
- ...is defined as follows: A target K attracts a feature F if F is the closest feature that can enter into a [[checking relation]] with a [[sublabel]] of K (Choms ...he [[functional head]] that attracts, can only attract in order to check a feature of its own. So it is not the moved element that is greedy, but the function2 KB (269 words) - 04:44, 7 October 2007
- ...way, applying the [[ECP]] means checking whether an empty category has the feature [+gamma] at LF.921 bytes (131 words) - 22:31, 15 February 2009
- ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
- (i) The head<sub>F</sub> (= head with respect to the feature F) of a word is the rightmost element of the word marked for the feature F2 KB (289 words) - 18:08, 28 September 2014
- ...used as a [[feature]] in the classification of speech sounds; see [[voice (feature)]]478 bytes (65 words) - 09:37, 25 September 2007
- '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
- '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
- Generally speaking, '''binarity''' relates to the fact that exactly two [[value]]s are available for a given choice or decision. ...inary iff it can take only one of two [[value]]s. For example, the lexical feature [concrete] can only assume the values [+ concrete] and [- concrete].595 bytes (94 words) - 13:16, 14 June 2009
- Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
- ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
- The term '''affective''' was used by Klima (1964) as denoting a property ('feature') of constituents that license [[Negative polarity item]]s. ...''Quant''(''ifier'') in construction with a constituent that contains the feature ''Affect''(''ive'') may ultimately appear as an indefinite."'' (Klima 1964:741 bytes (104 words) - 08:35, 9 September 2009
- ...lly assigned to such an element, it is said that this element absorbs that feature.960 bytes (142 words) - 12:55, 17 January 2008
- ...i.e. in the [[internal domain]] or [[checking domain]] of a head with an L-feature. Those L-related positions in a checking domain which are adjoined position753 bytes (105 words) - 17:35, 15 February 2009
- ...ature F1 located on a [[head]] X is in a '''checking configuration''' with feature F2 located on [[head]] Y, if Y is [[adjoined]] to X, or YP is in a [[specif639 bytes (98 words) - 04:45, 7 October 2007
- ...presentations at each level of representation are [[projection]]s of the [[feature]]s of [[lexical item]]s, notably their [[subcategorization]] features, and # if F is a lexical feature, it is projected at each syntactic level of representation ([[D-structure]]1 KB (174 words) - 12:56, 20 February 2009
- ...and/or in height) in case the segment is specified + or - for a particular feature, and broad in case the segment is specified neutrally. This means that + or2 KB (246 words) - 15:28, 7 September 2014
- ...ven [[feature value]] cannot attach to a [[stem]] bearing the same feature value. Marantz assumes that affixes are lexical items which have subcategorizatio1 KB (186 words) - 19:49, 17 February 2009
- ..., Norwegian, and Serbo-Croatian. In the other sense...it refers to a pitch feature (normally a localised pitch movement) associated with a prominent syllable: [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]1 KB (168 words) - 11:14, 9 September 2007
- ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
- Viele Konzepte der GPSG (ID/LP-Format, head feature convention) wurden von der [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] (kurz: * [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]2 KB (234 words) - 07:39, 14 April 2011
- Phonemes produced with the tip of the tongue are '''apical'''. The [[feature]] involved is [[coronal]].292 bytes (39 words) - 17:00, 20 September 2014
- * Englisch [[Feature instantiation principles]]114 bytes (10 words) - 10:53, 20 February 2009
- {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
- ...ntation of one of the stimuli could be explained by the fatigue of certain feature detectors rather than as a [[criterion shift]] (Eimas & Corbit, 1973). *Eimas, P.D. & J.D. Corbit. 1973. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. ''Cognitive Psychology 4'', 99-109.2 KB (359 words) - 17:17, 15 February 2009
- '''High''' is a feature which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue body fro533 bytes (81 words) - 15:57, 15 February 2009
- [[Category:Segmental feature]]274 bytes (38 words) - 19:37, 2 August 2014
- '''Sonorant''' is a [[phonological feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced in such a way that the [404 bytes (57 words) - 07:48, 3 November 2014
- [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]293 bytes (36 words) - 19:28, 20 July 2014
- In phonetics and phonology, a '''continuant''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[phoneme]]s that are produced without complete closu502 bytes (70 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
- In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
- In phonology. '''consonantal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced with an [[obstruction]] or a483 bytes (63 words) - 13:13, 14 May 2008
- ...um. Just as we don't find any feature which is in some context a semantic feature and in another a phonological, so don't we find that kind of thing between1 KB (181 words) - 06:05, 8 October 2017
- In phonology and phonetics, '''coronal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue blade518 bytes (76 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
- '''Lateral''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by raising the mid secti672 bytes (102 words) - 20:05, 16 February 2009
- '''Round''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by rounding the [[lips]]408 bytes (53 words) - 14:51, 5 October 2014
- '''Low''' is a phonological [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by lowering the [[body]]601 bytes (84 words) - 10:12, 17 February 2009
- ...[[extrametricality]], [[extrasyllabicity]], [[feature (in phonology)]], [[feature geometry]], [[fricative]], [[geminate]], [[government phonology]], [[h-aspi2 KB (198 words) - 06:31, 28 October 2007
- '''Deletion''' is the erasing of (at least) the phonological [[feature]]s of an element in a representation. In early versions of [[generative gra774 bytes (108 words) - 18:43, 12 February 2009
- ...may be no [[transformation]]s which are not driven by the need to check a feature.594 bytes (82 words) - 20:04, 16 February 2009
- '''Anterior''' is a feature which characterizes phonemes that are produced with an obstruction located624 bytes (88 words) - 13:49, 31 January 2008
- The acoustic characteristic corresponding with the perceptual feature pitch is the [[fundamental frequency]] of the [[sound wave]]: the frequency783 bytes (112 words) - 21:04, 19 February 2009
- ...ication of a sound permits it (i.e. if the sound is underspecified for the feature in question), the articulators are brought into the position necessary for797 bytes (119 words) - 21:09, 16 February 2009
- In [[J. R. Firth]]'s approach to phonology, a '''prosody''' is a [[feature]] that has as its [[domain]] more than a [[segment]].709 bytes (102 words) - 16:59, 30 August 2007
- '''Strident''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced with a complex [[constri576 bytes (74 words) - 08:52, 10 August 2014
- '''Syllabic''' is a [[feature]] used in the linear framework of Chomsky & Halle (1968), which charact518 bytes (69 words) - 08:26, 16 August 2014
- Examples are [[feature]]s (such as the distinctive features of phonology, as listed in Chomsky & H652 bytes (83 words) - 15:32, 30 July 2007
- [[Category:Segmental feature]]571 bytes (79 words) - 15:16, 10 June 2009
- [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
- ...f initial [[language acquisition]], or as non-distinctive, sub-segmental [[feature]]s of phonemes.403 bytes (58 words) - 19:56, 24 July 2010
- According to Chomsky (1992), ''a strange man'' cannot raise to check the case feature of matrix T; since ''a strange man'' has already been case-marked by ''to''940 bytes (142 words) - 15:47, 15 February 2009
- '''Nasal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by lowering the soft palate832 bytes (113 words) - 14:34, 20 February 2009
- '''Tense''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[vowel]]s that are produced with a [[tongue]] body o606 bytes (82 words) - 07:32, 17 August 2014
- [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
- ...have like an underived word in some respect, which means that at least one feature (semantic, syntactic, or phonological) becomes unpredictable. Thus a lexica1 KB (168 words) - 20:53, 16 February 2009
- One western feature has spread to the westernmost languages of [[Eastern Saamic]] ([[Inari Saam650 bytes (88 words) - 19:49, 2 August 2014
- *integration - the feature information is integrated651 bytes (98 words) - 17:05, 29 June 2014
- ...However, minimal pairs can also differ in [[tone]], [[accent]], or other [[feature]]s. Additionally, the term ''minimal pair'' has been extended to [[syntax]]581 bytes (88 words) - 20:20, 24 July 2010
- '''Advanced tongue root''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[phoneme]]s which are produced by pushing the tongue641 bytes (93 words) - 09:40, 14 June 2014
- Back is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by retracting the body of th624 bytes (92 words) - 15:55, 3 August 2014
- '''AGR''' is the person and number feature complex in finite [[INFL]].733 bytes (91 words) - 17:24, 12 June 2014
- * a phonological feature having as its domain more than a segment (see [[prosody (Firthian)]])1 KB (173 words) - 13:12, 20 February 2009
- ...he word class consisting of nouns and adjectives, sometimes defined by the feature [+N]' (=[[noun]]).1 KB (144 words) - 07:25, 26 June 2007
- ...to be a truism, an "absolute universal" in Greenberg's sense or a "design feature of language" in Hockett's sense, that all natural language utterances are m1 KB (162 words) - 14:56, 19 September 2007
- In Japanese gemination is a distinctive phonological feature.869 bytes (113 words) - 18:32, 20 September 2014
- At stage A of the derivation, T's EPP-feature must be [[check]]ed. This could be done by either merger of ''there'', or m2 KB (254 words) - 20:24, 16 February 2009
- ...re always voiced, as opposed to obstruents, can be captured by leaving the feature [voice] unspecified, and fill in [+voice] by a redundancy rule. The idea be1 KB (206 words) - 15:05, 20 February 2009
- * [[morphosyntactic feature]]1 KB (155 words) - 17:17, 3 February 2008
- The feature [voice] is distinctive within the class of obstruents, but non-distinctive961 bytes (130 words) - 08:11, 16 August 2014
- ...ed in a more neutral sense, however, to classify theories that prominently feature a formalised algorithm to "generate" linguistic structures. In that sense,908 bytes (122 words) - 17:22, 29 June 2014
- ...ut). Movement can only be procrastinated until after Spell-Out when [[weak feature]]s are involved; strong features are supposed to be uninterpretable at PF,968 bytes (132 words) - 19:09, 27 September 2014
- ...hat underlyingly both p's are not specified for aspiration. The aspiration feature is later (post-lexically) specified by a context-sensitive rule inserting [1,006 bytes (134 words) - 21:45, 7 February 2021
- ..., treats the sentence as being composed of [[attribute]]s, which include [[feature]]s such as number and tense or functional units such as [[subject]], [[pred Another feature of LFG is that grammatical-function changing operations like [[passivizatio4 KB (631 words) - 16:43, 9 April 2008
- ...ed to distinguish lexical items. In such languages tone is a [[distinctive feature]]. The most common opposition is that between a high and a low tone. But al944 bytes (152 words) - 18:57, 29 August 2014
- the feature [voice] is distinctive within the class of obstruents, but non-distinctive1 KB (146 words) - 13:55, 9 June 2009
- '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
- '''Inheritance''' is a process in which a category 'inherits' some feature of a lower category. <br />1 KB (205 words) - 17:10, 15 February 2009
- ...f stress assignment. In this analysis stress assignment rules assign the [[feature]] [1stress] to vowels. The operation of subsequent stress rules is subject1 KB (156 words) - 08:12, 16 August 2014
- B. Surányi, Differential Quantifier Scope: Q-Raising versus Q-Feature Checking. In: O. Bonami & P. C. Hofherr (Hg.), Empirical Issues in Formal S2 KB (215 words) - 12:24, 20 March 2008
- ...such as ''deduce'' and ''compose''. Given the further assumption that any feature marked on the head of a construction will percolate up to the node that dom2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
- ...hire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2011. Contact, the Feature Pool and the Speech Community: The Emergence of Multicultural London Englis1 KB (140 words) - 09:09, 13 November 2012
- *Benmamoun, E. 2000. ''The Feature Structure of Functional Categories. A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. *v. Riemsdijk, H. 1998. Categorial Feature Magnetism: The Endocentricity and Distribution of Projections. ''JCGL'' 2,4 KB (522 words) - 18:16, 11 July 2007
- ...odes may be positively affected by excitatory connections with both lower (feature, phonemic) and higher (sentential) levels of representation. In this way, t2 KB (227 words) - 19:44, 29 August 2014
- ...nd for at least one set of arguments A, with |A| > or = 2; it is a typical feature of such constructions that one of the arguments denotes a set A as specifie1 KB (215 words) - 17:35, 24 July 2014
- :::*''"In other cases there is not even a grammatical feature: a single phonetic form, in the manner of homonymy, represents two meanings2 KB (339 words) - 16:47, 10 June 2009
- ...the result looks like a [[verb raising]] construction. The distinguishing feature is the impossibility of [[IPP]] in case of a third construction, and the fa2 KB (289 words) - 09:36, 17 August 2014
- *Ž. Bošković, On Multiple Feature Checking: Multiple Wh-Fronting and Multiple Head Movement. In: S. Epstein &2 KB (233 words) - 16:18, 6 July 2014
- ...hypothesis there is a single L-rule of pluralization which simply adds the feature [plural]. The resulting abstract morpheme is input to different M-rules, an2 KB (267 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
- '''Tense''' is traditionally defined as a grammatical feature or (deictic) category expressing a temporal relation between the event desc Alternatively, '''tense''' can be defined as a grammatical feature or (deictic) category encoding a temporal relation between the [[topic time6 KB (863 words) - 20:49, 23 May 2010