Search results

Create the page "Category-neutral rule" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• LP-rule
  LP-rules restrict the set of local trees admitted by an ID-rule. An LD-rule ''X'' <math>\prec</math> ''Y'' states that category ''X'' has to precede ca * [[ID-rule]]
  665 bytes (92 words) - 17:08, 6 July 2014
• ID/LP rules
  ...(GPSG) uses [[ID-rule|ID-rules]] (''immediate dominance rules'') and [[LP-rule|LP-rules]] (''linear precedence rules'') instead of context-free phrase str ...nterpreted as well-formedness conditions for [[local tree|local trees]]. A rule like ''X'' <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>Y_1</math> <math>Y_2</math> ... <
  2 KB (278 words) - 20:45, 3 July 2014
• Underspecification
  ...n all other contexts. See [[Structure preservation]], [[structure-building rule]].
  1,006 bytes (134 words) - 21:45, 7 February 2021
• Readjustment rule
  ...by Chomsky &amp; Halle (1968) to modify the output of the [[word formation rule]]s or the output of the syntactic rules before these structures enter the p [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Readjustment+rule&lemmacode=314 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  939 bytes (130 words) - 08:26, 28 September 2014
• Transformational rule
  '''Transformational rule''' is a [[rule]] that transforms [[syntactic structure]]. [[Deletion]], Insertion, and [[m *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Transformational+rule&lemmacode=187 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  662 bytes (84 words) - 19:48, 29 August 2014
• Structure preservation
  A rule or rule system is structure preserving if its output is independently available as ...ng, but characteristically this rule does not effect sonorants. Hence, the rule of final devoicing is structure preserving.
  1 KB (207 words) - 09:11, 10 August 2014
• A-over-A
  ...t if a rule ambiguously refers to A in a structure of the form of (i), the rule must apply to the higher, more inclusive, node A (Chomsky 1964).
  1 KB (171 words) - 17:03, 6 February 2008
• ID-rule
  An ID-rule ''X'' <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>Y_1,</math> <math>Y_2,</math> ..., <ma * [[LP-rule]]
  890 bytes (124 words) - 20:42, 3 July 2014
• Adjacency Condition
  ...gical rule. Intuitively, the Adjacency Condition prevents a word formation rule from looking into the entire derivational history of morphologically comple ...ub>A</sub>''), and the Adjacency Condition makes the ''-baar'' suffixation rule insensitive to the intransitive nature of the [[verb]] ''klimmen''.
  2 KB (315 words) - 15:17, 22 January 2008
• Separation hypothesis
  ...separated from their [[function]]. Beard distinguishes [[L-rule]]s and [[M-rule]]s, and assumes that L-rules are grammatical processes which change or add ...he chance of giving phonological content to the function supplied by the L-rule.
  2 KB (267 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
• Lexical category prominence
  .... [[feet]] (=F)) that consist of syllables. The main part of this labeling rule in English states that in a configuration [A B], B is labeled strong if and
  1 KB (195 words) - 20:24, 16 February 2009
• Sound change
  ...called a [[sound law]] or a [[phonetical rule]]. Exceptions to the law or rule can normally be explained by analogy. Some important sound laws were descri
  778 bytes (111 words) - 14:57, 27 July 2014
• Phrase structure rules
  Thus the phrase structure rule in (ii)a characterizes a sentence (S) as the combination of an NP (the subj ...ule in (ii)b gives the internal structure of the [[VP]]. According to this rule, a verbal phrase consists of a verb and, optionally, an [[NP]] and a [[PP]]
  3 KB (514 words) - 20:58, 19 February 2009
• Feature specification defaults
  ...category which are not determined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). ...instantiated in any lexical category; i.e. it has to be licenced by an ID-rule or an lexical entry.
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Metarules
  ...o generate for each VP-rule introducing a transitive verb a new lexical ID rule which introduces a passive verb form accompanied by the same phrases, excep
  1 KB (200 words) - 10:00, 14 February 2008
• Diphthongization
  '''Diphthongization''' is a [[phonological rule]] involving a change from a [[monophtong]] to a [[diphthong]].
  450 bytes (56 words) - 20:44, 12 February 2009
• Generate
  ...ules starting with applying a rule to the start symbol and each successive rule being applied to the output of the former, until no auxiliary symbols remai
  1 KB (226 words) - 15:30, 15 February 2009
• Global economy
  It will rule out (ii), because the link between the wh-element and its trace is longer i The local version of the MLC will rule out the derivation with movement of ''what'' right at this point in the der
  2 KB (277 words) - 15:36, 15 February 2009
• Extrinsische Regelordnung
  *Pelletier, F. J. 1980. The Generative Power of Rule Orderings in Formal Grammars. ''Linguistics'' 18, 17–72. Englisch [[extrinsic rule order]]
  2 KB (191 words) - 19:32, 17 October 2007
• Derivative
  A '''derivative''' is a [[lexeme]] that is related to another lexeme by a rule of [[derivation]].
  274 bytes (36 words) - 18:05, 28 June 2014
• Atom Condition
  ...is Atom Condition, Williams is able to account for the fact the affixation rule which attaches ''-ion'' can (indirectly) refer to the root features.
  2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
• Allophony
  ...The differences between the allophones can be expressed by [[phonological rule]]s.
  616 bytes (86 words) - 15:53, 28 January 2008
• Surface structure
  ...ived from Deep structure ( [[D-structure]]) by means of [[transformational rule]]s. Also [[S-structure]].
  455 bytes (55 words) - 08:20, 16 August 2014
• Head
  ...d. This generalization lies at the heart of the so-called [[Righthand Head Rule]]. ...thstand''. Also see [[relativized head]], and [[Relativized Righthand Head Rule]].
  2 KB (295 words) - 15:55, 15 February 2009
• Psych-movement
  '''Psych-movement''' is a rule which is similar to [[passive]], in that it [[move]]s the [[object]] of a [
  639 bytes (89 words) - 13:17, 20 February 2009
• Braces
  Braces are a means to abbreviate the rules (i) and (ii) as the one rule (iii).
  514 bytes (70 words) - 15:38, 20 April 2008
• Insert alpha
  ...x]], '''insert alpha''' is an instance of the general [[transformation]]al rule [[affect alpha]]. Few rules that insert material in the course of a derivat
  619 bytes (81 words) - 22:25, 15 February 2009
• Pronominalization (in generative grammar)
  ...to account for the occurrence of anaphoric pronouns by a transformational rule.
  516 bytes (66 words) - 17:32, 30 January 2009
• Morpheme-based morphology
  ...heory it is assumed that new words are formed by applying a word formation rule to a single already existing word. Both the new word and the existing one a ...d morphology the words in (i) cannot be formed by a regular word formation rule. In a morpheme-based morphology, on the other hand, it is allowed to genera
  2 KB (301 words) - 19:12, 17 February 2009
• Base component
  ...mar in which [[D-structure]]s are generated by means of [[phrase structure rule]]s and the [[Projection Principle]], on the basis of information from the [
  450 bytes (63 words) - 17:06, 15 June 2014
• Cyclicity
  ...ounding nodes. Originally, cyclicity was considered a property of rules or rule systems: a set of rules are to be applied cyclically to successively larger
  825 bytes (112 words) - 18:12, 22 May 2008
• Morphologization
  ...n the context of the affixal front-vowel ''i'', changed to a morphological rule which led to umlaut-formation in plural-contexts. This strategy has been de
  2 KB (343 words) - 16:21, 29 October 2007
• Superiority condition
  No rule can involve X,Y in the structure where the rule applies ambiguously to Z and Y
  2 KB (236 words) - 08:16, 16 August 2014
• IS A Condition
  ...he Is A Condition is the predecessor of Williams' (1981a) [[Righthand Head Rule]].
  857 bytes (128 words) - 16:11, 15 February 2009
• Lexicalization
  ...uming that lexicalization eradicates internal boundaries, the phonological rule FINAL DEVOICING cannot apply in the lexicalized form.
  1 KB (168 words) - 20:53, 16 February 2009
• Crossover
  ...ioned in the structural index of a transformation may be reordered by that rule in such a way as to cross over a co-referential NP.'' (Ross 1967:73)
  1 KB (165 words) - 16:02, 22 May 2008
• S-structure
  ...level of representation derived from [[d-structure]] by [[transformational rule]]s, and input to the rules deriving [[PF]] and [[LF]]. S-structure is the [
  610 bytes (78 words) - 15:56, 5 October 2014
• Escape hatch
  No rule can invoke X,Y in the structure
  1 KB (191 words) - 17:04, 13 February 2009
• Extrametricality
  ...re not there. Hayes (1982) argues that extrametricality can be assigned by rule and is subject to the [[Peripherality Condition]]<nowiki>: extrametrical el
  2 KB (266 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2019
• Blocking
  ...tal dictionary, prevents the application of an unproductive word formation rule, if that application would give rise to a complex word having the same sema
  1 KB (167 words) - 15:05, 23 March 2008
• Lexicon
  ...a word which can be predicted by phonological, morphological, or syntactic rule will therefore be excluded from the lexicon. In this approach the lexicon i ...ation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''op
  3 KB (472 words) - 09:02, 26 May 2013
• Expletive infixation
  ...e term '''expletive infixation''' is sometimes used for the [[infixation]] rule that allows speakers to insert an expletive word (i.e. a rude word such as
  1,009 bytes (122 words) - 16:47, 25 January 2009
• Bare argument ellipsis
  :::*''“...a rule that deletes everything in a clause under identity with corresponding parts
  1 KB (152 words) - 14:07, 18 September 2008
• Morpheme Structure Condition
  ...logical shape of morphemes are sometimes expressed by lexical [[redundancy rule]]s.
  1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
• Right node raising
  * Postal, P.M. 1974. ''On Raising. One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications,'' The MIT Press: Cambr
  893 bytes (135 words) - 18:19, 28 September 2014
• Derivation
  ...generative syntax|generative syntax]], it refers to the entire sequence of rule applications in the process of generating a terminal string on the basis of
  954 bytes (131 words) - 18:03, 28 June 2014
• Allomorph
  The rule is as follows:
  885 bytes (130 words) - 17:17, 18 June 2014
• No Phrase Constraint
  *[[Botha, Rudolf]]. 1981. “A Base Rule Theory of Afrikaans Synthetic Compounding”. In: ''The Scope of Lexical Ru
  902 bytes (131 words) - 16:13, 8 July 2009
• Loop
  ...level]] (or [[stratum]]) n-1 after the application of the [[word formation rule]]s of level/stratum n.
  1 KB (213 words) - 10:14, 17 February 2009
• Swedish
  * Sydsvenska mål: was under Danish rule until 1658; spoken in Skåne, Blekinge, boarderlands of Halland and souther
  5 KB (658 words) - 11:34, 2 March 2018
• ID-Regel
  * Englisch [[ID-rule]]
  1,001 bytes (124 words) - 20:44, 3 July 2014
• Macroparadigm
  ...tems with [[front vowel]]s select front vowels. This variation is due to a rule of [[vowel harmony]]. Second, if a consonant cluster of three members arise
  1 KB (206 words) - 16:44, 6 October 2007
• Ersetzungsregel
  Englisch [[rewriting rule]] <br> Französisch [[règle du réécriture]]<br>
  1 KB (131 words) - 15:57, 29 June 2014
• Word-based morphology
  ...] processes are word-based. A new [[word]] is formed by applying a regular rule to a single already existing word. Both the new word and the existing one a
  999 bytes (135 words) - 18:45, 7 September 2014
• LP-Regel
  * Englisch [[LP-rule]]
  952 bytes (116 words) - 17:07, 6 July 2014
• Verner's law
  ...ties. According to his biographical notes (Verner 1903), he formulated the rule already in 1875 and published it in 1876 under a misleading title ''Eine Au Verner's rule can be exemplified with the development of the word ''*ph₂tḗr'
  3 KB (359 words) - 10:06, 14 September 2014
• Lexikonregel
  Englisch [[lexical rule]]
  1 KB (179 words) - 06:54, 17 October 2007
• Stress subordination principle
  ...assignment of stress in the [[compound]] ''black-board''. The main stress rule applies in a cyclic fashion (see [[cyclic domain]]), reassigning [1stress];
  1 KB (156 words) - 08:12, 16 August 2014
• Institutionalized
  ...zed]], i.e. have special properties not predictable from its parts and the rule by which it was created.
  1 KB (157 words) - 14:57, 20 May 2013
• Portal:Psycholinguistics
  ...ect]], [[sine-wave speech]], [[categorical perception]], [[consonant-vowel rule]], [[duplex perception]], [[fuzzy logic model of perception]], [[stranding ...sentence]], [[late closure]], [[minimal attachment]], [[syntactic category rule]], [[syntactic frame]], [[trace deletion hypothesis]]
  4 KB (349 words) - 23:14, 11 November 2012
• Extraposition
  '''Extraposition''' is originally a movement rule that moves [[CP]]s and PPs to the [[right periphery]] of the [[sentence]].
  2 KB (326 words) - 20:32, 13 February 2009
• Elliptical
  In syntax, the term '''ellipsis''' is used for cases of rule-governed omission of constituents that are notionally and syntactically req
  1 KB (173 words) - 18:59, 28 June 2014
• Metrical tree
  ...eled Weak-Strong or Strong-Weak (or by the [[Lexical Category Prominence]] Rule).
  2 KB (243 words) - 08:24, 15 October 2007
• Specified subject condition
  (i) No rule can involve X, Y in the structure
  1 KB (196 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
• Realizational formula
  ...ory. A realizational formula bears a superficial resemblance to a rewrite rule. But unlike rewrite or mutation rules in a process description, realizatio
  1 KB (172 words) - 01:46, 26 July 2018
• Righthand head rule
  '''Righthand Head Rule''' is a principle proposed in Williams (1981a) which says that the righthan *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Righthand+Head+Rule&lemmacode=353 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  1 KB (233 words) - 18:40, 28 September 2014
• Agglutinating language
  ...uage''' is a language which has a morphological system in which words as a rule are polymorphemic and where each [[morpheme]] corresponds to a single lexic
  1 KB (191 words) - 15:28, 18 May 2014
• Tagger
  It is common practice to distinguish between rule-based and stochastic taggers, though some taggers combine rules and stochas
  1 KB (164 words) - 16:30, 27 July 2014
• Ellipsis
  In syntax, the term '''ellipsis''' is used for cases of rule-governed omission of constituents that are notionally and syntactically req
  2 KB (193 words) - 18:59, 28 June 2014
• Gapping
  ...term was introduced by Ross (1967) as a kind of [[conjunction reduction]] rule.
  2 KB (359 words) - 16:55, 17 March 2009
• Morphological component
  A component in the grammar in which the [[word formation rule]]s apply. The question whether there is actually an autonomous morphologica
  2 KB (339 words) - 19:18, 17 February 2009
• Osthoff's law
  * Kiparsky, Paul. 1967. A phonological rule of Greek. ''Glotta'' 44.109-34.
  2 KB (200 words) - 18:56, 21 September 2014
• Functional Grammar
  ...tico-pragmatic [[underlying representation]] (UR) by means of [[expression rule]]s.
  3 KB (400 words) - 15:53, 2 March 2009
• Tensed-S Condition
  No rule can involve X,Y in the structure ...X...[_a...Y...]...
  2 KB (253 words) - 07:34, 17 August 2014
• Truncation
  ...oblematic. Aronoff (1976) solves this problem by allowing for a truncation rule that deletes -''ate'' if it is followed by -''ee'', as in (ii):
  2 KB (265 words) - 08:03, 30 August 2014
• Stress
  ...', ''a PICture frame''. There are many (partly regular) exceptions to this rule, however, e.g. ''silk TIE'' and ''apple PIE'' (cf. Plag 2003).
  5 KB (653 words) - 12:00, 20 May 2013
• Raising to object
  * Postal, P.M. 1974. ''On Raising. One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications,'' The MIT Press: Cambr
  2 KB (271 words) - 08:15, 28 September 2014
• Quantifier Raising
  ...] of the operator can be calculated. One empirical advantage of assuming a rule of QR which mediates the determination of relative scope is that it explain
  2 KB (348 words) - 08:01, 28 September 2014
• Lexical morphology
  ...domain of application. Within the lexicon, the output of a word formation rule is submitted to the phonological rules of that level. In this respect, the
  4 KB (545 words) - 20:21, 16 February 2009
• Restructuring
  ...s illustrated in (ii). No satisfactory formalization of Restructuring as a rule is available. A [[verb raising]] type of analysis, which would create a ver
  2 KB (335 words) - 17:14, 28 September 2014
• T-model
  ...umed that, in [[English]], DS ( [[D-structure]]) is generated by [[rewrite rule]]s, or is projected from the rules of [[X-bar theory]], and obeys the condi
  2 KB (303 words) - 07:06, 17 August 2014
• Zyklusprinzip
  *Epstein, S. & Seely, D. 2002. Rule Applications as Cycles in a Level-Free Syntax. In: dieselben (Hrsg.) ''Deri
  3 KB (377 words) - 17:36, 23 July 2007
• Kreativität
  ...ät (''rule governed creativity'') von der regelverändernden Kreativität (''rule-changing creativity''): erstere repräsentiert die menschlich-sprachliche K
  6 KB (701 words) - 16:19, 6 July 2014
• Swedish Phonology
  c) Participles: Furthermore the rule mentioned above also applies to past participles.<ref name="lindqvist"/> ...troflex consonants themselves can trigger a progressive assimilation. This rule is obligatory up to the word boundary. Across the word boundary it is optio
  36 KB (4,969 words) - 13:01, 2 March 2018
• Maxim of manner
  ...istic ('M-heuristic') relates to the maxim of manner, in particular to the rule ''avoid obscurity of expression''. Levinson argues that on the basis of the
  5 KB (819 words) - 12:34, 13 July 2014
• Jan Czekanowski
  ...ndstill which, by the way, has remained so to this day. Exceptions to this rule, e.g. J. Woronczak’s ideas which, for various reasons, did not reach prac
  7 KB (1,007 words) - 13:00, 28 November 2007
• Error analysis
  ...ated from intralingual errors, occuring for example when a target language rule is applied to areas where it is not applicable. Corder also pointed out tha
  8 KB (1,122 words) - 20:58, 19 September 2009
• Coherence
  As a rule of thumb, a text can be coherent without being cohesive, and vice versa. Th ...which consists of a theme combined with a rheme (Halliday 1994: 37). As a rule of thumb, the theme is always the left-most constituent in a sentence. Cons
  16 KB (2,344 words) - 11:49, 20 May 2013
• Multilingualism
  ...or societies are exceptional. The misbelief that [[monolingualism]] is the rule is due to the fact that there are only few countries where more than one of
  18 KB (2,684 words) - 16:51, 22 May 2013
• James D. McCawley/publications
  ...gh, 1976bdfgi, 1977ade, 1979b, and (previously unpublished) 'Statement vs. rule in linguistic description'; with introduction and notes.
  31 KB (4,322 words) - 06:06, 8 March 2009

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)