Search results

Create the page "Feature value" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• EPP feature
  ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
• L-feature
  '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
• Feature
  In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].
  4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
• Feature checking
  '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').
  588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Weak feature
  [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
• Strong feature
  [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
• Semantic feature
  {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}
  97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
• Rule feature
  ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
• Feature matrix
  A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.
  648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
• Feature percolation
  '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan
  1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Diacritic feature
  '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.
  1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
• Feature percolation conventions
  '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
• Feature instantiation principles
  139 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 29 June 2014
• Feature specification defaults
  ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions
  ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
  1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Feature specification defaults (de)
  Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati
  943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)
  ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014

Page text matches

• Feature checking
  '''Feature checking''' is a Notion in [[checking theory]]. Feature checking is a relation between two elements such that one or more designate ...c,CP) against the +wh feature of C. If ''who'' or C do not check their +wh feature, the derivation [[crash]]es (cf. *''you saw who'').
  588 bytes (93 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Feature matrix
  A '''feature matrix''' is a set of [[feature]]s that characterizes a given set of linguistic units with respect to a fin In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specific [[word field]]s.
  648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
• L-feature
  '''L-feature''' is feature of a lexical item which is involved in [[feature checking]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=L-feature&lemmacode=618 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  572 bytes (77 words) - 17:34, 15 February 2009
• Active
  ...g goal, i.e. a category Y with a matching (e.g. identical or non-distinct) feature F’. Matching of probe-goal induces Agree, a relation eliminating the unin
  530 bytes (81 words) - 16:14, 21 January 2008
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions
  ...ets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FC Only verbal catgories can contain the feature ''vform'': [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]
  1 KB (154 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Obstruent
  ...ract; the air pressure is built up inside the cavity. Obstruents share the feature [-son]. ...e feature theory]], obstruents are represented with the minus-value of the feature [son] or [sonorant].
  827 bytes (119 words) - 10:22, 18 February 2009
• Isogloss
  ...on a map to mark the boundary of an area in which a particular linguistic feature is used. A number (or [[bundle]]) of isoglosses falling together in one pla The term is also used figuratively for the feature itself.
  502 bytes (75 words) - 21:13, 15 February 2009
• Feature specification defaults
  ...termined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). The feature specification [VFORM PAS] (''verb form'' = passive participle) will not be
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Checking theory
  ...h a matching ([[uninterpretable]]) feature F', deletes the uninterpretable feature F' in B. If F in A is uninterpretable, F is also deleted. ...movement is supposed to exist independently, for functional reasons, and [[feature checking]] is considered to be one of the mechanisms that can implement mov
  1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
• Attractor
  ...tor''' is the uninterpretable (inherent) feature which attracts a matching feature (in order to be deleted).
  346 bytes (44 words) - 17:04, 20 September 2014
• Sublabel
  In the [[Minimalist Program]] (Chomsky 1995), a '''sublabel''' is a feature associated with a [[label]]. ...le, the EPP-feature forces movement of the subject to spec,T, and the [-V]-feature forces movement of the verb to T. The features of heads that are adjoined t
  993 bytes (142 words) - 13:52, 7 October 2007
• Attract
  ...is defined as follows: A target K attracts a feature F if F is the closest feature that can enter into a [[checking relation]] with a [[sublabel]] of K (Choms ...he [[functional head]] that attracts, can only attract in order to check a feature of its own. So it is not the moved element that is greedy, but the function
  2 KB (269 words) - 04:44, 7 October 2007
• Gamma-marking
  ...way, applying the [[ECP]] means checking whether an empty category has the feature [+gamma] at LF.
  921 bytes (131 words) - 22:31, 15 February 2009
• EPP feature
  ...strong [[D-feature]] on the functional category [[Tense|T(ense)]]. This D-feature can trigger either movement of the subject to spec,T, or insertion of an [[ [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=EPP-feature&lemmacode=1534 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  588 bytes (78 words) - 16:23, 13 February 2009
• Relativized head
  (i) The head_F (= head with respect to the feature F) of a word is the rightmost element of the word marked for the feature F
  2 KB (289 words) - 18:08, 28 September 2014
• Voice
  ...used as a [[feature]] in the classification of speech sounds; see [[voice (feature)]]
  478 bytes (65 words) - 09:37, 25 September 2007
• Feature percolation
  '''Feature Percolation''' is a mechanism proposed in Lieber (1980) and Williams (1981a ...' also is a strong verb. This can be accounted for if one assumes that the feature [+ablaut] will percolate up to the node dominating both ''with'' and ''stan
  1 KB (178 words) - 20:40, 13 February 2009
• Diacritic feature
  '''Diacritic feature''' is a formal expression of unpredictable information about words in their ...- latinate] or [+/- native] (e.g. Aronoff 1976). Another term is exception feature.
  1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
• Binarity
  Generally speaking, '''binarity''' relates to the fact that exactly two [[value]]s are available for a given choice or decision. ...inary iff it can take only one of two [[value]]s. For example, the lexical feature [concrete] can only assume the values [+ concrete] and [- concrete].
  595 bytes (94 words) - 13:16, 14 June 2009
• Feature specification defaults (de)
  Feature specification defaults (FSDs) werden in der [[Generalisierte Phrasenstruktu Ähnlich wie die [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]], so können auch die meisten FSDs als Implikati
  943 bytes (105 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Rule feature
  ...re which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...for by assuming that the words ''foot, goose'' and ''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
• Affective (context)
  The term '''affective''' was used by Klima (1964) as denoting a property ('feature') of constituents that license [[Negative polarity item]]s. ...''Quant''(''ifier'') in construction with a constituent that contains the feature ''Affect''(''ive'') may ultimately appear as an indefinite."'' (Klima 1964:
  741 bytes (104 words) - 08:35, 9 September 2009
• Absorption
  ...lly assigned to such an element, it is said that this element absorbs that feature.
  960 bytes (142 words) - 12:55, 17 January 2008
• L-related
  ...i.e. in the [[internal domain]] or [[checking domain]] of a head with an L-feature. Those L-related positions in a checking domain which are adjoined position
  753 bytes (105 words) - 17:35, 15 February 2009
• Checking configuration
  ...ature F1 located on a [[head]] X is in a '''checking configuration''' with feature F2 located on [[head]] Y, if Y is [[adjoined]] to X, or YP is in a [[specif
  639 bytes (98 words) - 04:45, 7 October 2007
• Projection Principle
  ...presentations at each level of representation are [[projection]]s of the [[feature]]s of [[lexical item]]s, notably their [[subcategorization]] features, and # if F is a lexical feature, it is projected at each syntactic level of representation ([[D-structure]]
  1 KB (174 words) - 12:56, 20 February 2009
• Window model
  ...and/or in height) in case the segment is specified + or - for a particular feature, and broad in case the segment is specified neutrally. This means that + or
  2 KB (246 words) - 15:28, 7 September 2014
• No Vacuous Application Principle
  ...ven [[feature value]] cannot attach to a [[stem]] bearing the same feature value. Marantz assumes that affixes are lexical items which have subcategorizatio
  1 KB (186 words) - 19:49, 17 February 2009
• Pitch accent (lexical)
  ..., Norwegian, and Serbo-Croatian. In the other sense...it refers to a pitch feature (normally a localised pitch movement) associated with a prominent syllable: [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]
  1 KB (168 words) - 11:14, 9 September 2007
• Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)
  ...ukturgrammatik|Generalisierten Phrasenstrukturgrammatik]] (GPSG) werden '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) verwendet, um Wohlgeformtheitsbedingung * Englisch [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  1,007 bytes (109 words) - 16:17, 29 June 2014
• Generalisierte Phrasenstrukturgrammatik
  Viele Konzepte der GPSG (ID/LP-Format, head feature convention) wurden von der [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]] (kurz: * [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions]]
  2 KB (234 words) - 07:39, 14 April 2011
• Apical
  Phonemes produced with the tip of the tongue are '''apical'''. The [[feature]] involved is [[coronal]].
  292 bytes (39 words) - 17:00, 20 September 2014
• Merkmalsinstantiierungsprinzipien
  * Englisch [[Feature instantiation principles]]
  114 bytes (10 words) - 10:53, 20 February 2009
• Semantic feature
  {{Wikipedia|Semantic feature|en}}
  97 bytes (10 words) - 12:40, 26 July 2014
• Adaptation
  ...ntation of one of the stimuli could be explained by the fatigue of certain feature detectors rather than as a [[criterion shift]] (Eimas & Corbit, 1973). *Eimas, P.D. & J.D. Corbit. 1973. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. ''Cognitive Psychology 4'', 99-109.
  2 KB (359 words) - 17:17, 15 February 2009
• High (sound)
  '''High''' is a feature which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue body fro
  533 bytes (81 words) - 15:57, 15 February 2009
• Voiceless
  [[Category:Segmental feature]]
  274 bytes (38 words) - 19:37, 2 August 2014
• Sonorant
  '''Sonorant''' is a [[phonological feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced in such a way that the [
  404 bytes (57 words) - 07:48, 3 November 2014
• Primary stress
  [[Category:Suprasegmental feature]]
  293 bytes (36 words) - 19:28, 20 July 2014
• Continuant
  In phonetics and phonology, a '''continuant''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[phoneme]]s that are produced without complete closu
  502 bytes (70 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
• Feature
  In contemporary linguistics, the term '''feature''' is used in several ways. Two main uses can be distinguished: ...e]]. For example, the English noun ''bread'' carries the value '+' for the feature [countability].
  4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
• Consonantal
  In phonology. '''consonantal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced with an [[obstruction]] or a
  483 bytes (63 words) - 13:13, 14 May 2008
• Realization
  ...um. Just as we don't find any feature which is in some context a semantic feature and in another a phonological, so don't we find that kind of thing between
  1 KB (181 words) - 06:05, 8 October 2017
• Coronal
  In phonology and phonetics, '''coronal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by raising the tongue blade
  518 bytes (76 words) - 14:29, 20 February 2009
• Lateral
  '''Lateral''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by raising the mid secti
  672 bytes (102 words) - 20:05, 16 February 2009
• Round
  '''Round''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by rounding the [[lips]]
  408 bytes (53 words) - 14:51, 5 October 2014
• Low
  '''Low''' is a phonological [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced by lowering the [[body]]
  601 bytes (84 words) - 10:12, 17 February 2009
• Portal:Phonetics and phonology
  ...[[extrametricality]], [[extrasyllabicity]], [[feature (in phonology)]], [[feature geometry]], [[fricative]], [[geminate]], [[government phonology]], [[h-aspi
  2 KB (198 words) - 06:31, 28 October 2007
• Deletion
  '''Deletion''' is the erasing of (at least) the phonological [[feature]]s of an element in a representation. In early versions of [[generative gra
  774 bytes (108 words) - 18:43, 12 February 2009
• Last resort
  ...may be no [[transformation]]s which are not driven by the need to check a feature.
  594 bytes (82 words) - 20:04, 16 February 2009
• Anterior
  '''Anterior''' is a feature which characterizes phonemes that are produced with an obstruction located
  624 bytes (88 words) - 13:49, 31 January 2008
• Pitch
  The acoustic characteristic corresponding with the perceptual feature pitch is the [[fundamental frequency]] of the [[sound wave]]: the frequency
  783 bytes (112 words) - 21:04, 19 February 2009
• Look-ahead model
  ...ication of a sound permits it (i.e. if the sound is underspecified for the feature in question), the articulators are brought into the position necessary for
  797 bytes (119 words) - 21:09, 16 February 2009
• Prosody (Firthian)
  In [[J. R. Firth]]'s approach to phonology, a '''prosody''' is a [[feature]] that has as its [[domain]] more than a [[segment]].
  709 bytes (102 words) - 16:59, 30 August 2007
• Strident
  '''Strident''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[sound]]s that are produced with a complex [[constri
  576 bytes (74 words) - 08:52, 10 August 2014
• Syllabic
  '''Syllabic''' is a [[feature]] used in the linear framework of Chomsky &amp; Halle (1968), which charact
  518 bytes (69 words) - 08:26, 16 August 2014
• Substantive universal
  Examples are [[feature]]s (such as the distinctive features of phonology, as listed in Chomsky & H
  652 bytes (83 words) - 15:32, 30 July 2007
• Voiced
  [[Category:Segmental feature]]
  571 bytes (79 words) - 15:16, 10 June 2009
• Strong feature
  [[Minimalist Theory]] feature which must be checked in overt syntax. See [[Procrastinate]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Strong+feature&lemmacode=271 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  532 bytes (66 words) - 09:00, 10 August 2014
• Speech sound
  ...f initial [[language acquisition]], or as non-distinctive, sub-segmental [[feature]]s of phonemes.
  403 bytes (58 words) - 19:56, 24 July 2010
• Greed
  According to Chomsky (1992), ''a strange man'' cannot raise to check the case feature of matrix T; since ''a strange man'' has already been case-marked by ''to''
  940 bytes (142 words) - 15:47, 15 February 2009
• Nasal
  '''Nasal''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by lowering the soft palate
  832 bytes (113 words) - 14:34, 20 February 2009
• Tense vowel
  '''Tense''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[vowel]]s that are produced with a [[tongue]] body o
  606 bytes (82 words) - 07:32, 17 August 2014
• Weak feature
  [[Minimalist theory]] feature which must be checked in covert syntax (due to [[Procrastinate]]). *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Weak+feature&lemmacode=81 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  534 bytes (67 words) - 18:06, 4 September 2014
• Lexicalization
  ...have like an underived word in some respect, which means that at least one feature (semantic, syntactic, or phonological) becomes unpredictable. Thus a lexica
  1 KB (168 words) - 20:53, 16 February 2009
• Western Saamic
  One western feature has spread to the westernmost languages of [[Eastern Saamic]] ([[Inari Saam
  650 bytes (88 words) - 19:49, 2 August 2014
• Fuzzy logic model of perception
  *integration - the feature information is integrated
  651 bytes (98 words) - 17:05, 29 June 2014
• Minimal pair
  ...However, minimal pairs can also differ in [[tone]], [[accent]], or other [[feature]]s. Additionally, the term ''minimal pair'' has been extended to [[syntax]]
  581 bytes (88 words) - 20:20, 24 July 2010
• Advanced tongue root
  '''Advanced tongue root''' is a [[feature]] which characterizes [[phoneme]]s which are produced by pushing the tongue
  641 bytes (93 words) - 09:40, 14 June 2014
• Back
  Back is a [[feature]] which characterizes sounds that are produced by retracting the body of th
  624 bytes (92 words) - 15:55, 3 August 2014
• AGR
  '''AGR''' is the person and number feature complex in finite [[INFL]].
  733 bytes (91 words) - 17:24, 12 June 2014
• Prosody
  * a phonological feature having as its domain more than a segment (see [[prosody (Firthian)]])
  1 KB (173 words) - 13:12, 20 February 2009
• Substantive (noun or adjective)
  ...he word class consisting of nouns and adjectives, sometimes defined by the feature [+N]' (=[[noun]]).
  1 KB (144 words) - 07:25, 26 June 2007
• Syntactic category
  ...to be a truism, an "absolute universal" in Greenberg's sense or a "design feature of language" in Hockett's sense, that all natural language utterances are m
  1 KB (162 words) - 14:56, 19 September 2007
• Geminate
  In Japanese gemination is a distinctive phonological feature.
  869 bytes (113 words) - 18:32, 20 September 2014
• Lexical array
  At stage A of the derivation, T's EPP-feature must be [[check]]ed. This could be done by either merger of ''there'', or m
  2 KB (254 words) - 20:24, 16 February 2009
• Redundancy rule
  ...re always voiced, as opposed to obstruents, can be captured by leaving the feature [voice] unspecified, and fill in [+voice] by a redundancy rule. The idea be
  1 KB (206 words) - 15:05, 20 February 2009
• Category-system
  * [[morphosyntactic feature]]
  1 KB (155 words) - 17:17, 3 February 2008
• Structure-changing rule
  The feature [voice] is distinctive within the class of obstruents, but non-distinctive
  961 bytes (130 words) - 08:11, 16 August 2014
• Generative linguistics
  ...ed in a more neutral sense, however, to classify theories that prominently feature a formalised algorithm to "generate" linguistic structures. In that sense,
  908 bytes (122 words) - 17:22, 29 June 2014
• Procrastinate
  ...ut). Movement can only be procrastinated until after Spell-Out when [[weak feature]]s are involved; strong features are supposed to be uninterpretable at PF,
  968 bytes (132 words) - 19:09, 27 September 2014
• Underspecification
  ...hat underlyingly both p's are not specified for aspiration. The aspiration feature is later (post-lexically) specified by a context-sensitive rule inserting [
  1,006 bytes (134 words) - 21:45, 7 February 2021
• Lexical Functional Grammar
  ..., treats the sentence as being composed of [[attribute]]s, which include [[feature]]s such as number and tense or functional units such as [[subject]], [[pred Another feature of LFG is that grammatical-function changing operations like [[passivizatio
  4 KB (631 words) - 16:43, 9 April 2008
• Tone
  ...ed to distinguish lexical items. In such languages tone is a [[distinctive feature]]. The most common opposition is that between a high and a low tone. But al
  944 bytes (152 words) - 18:57, 29 August 2014
• Structure-building rule
  the feature [voice] is distinctive within the class of obstruents, but non-distinctive
  1 KB (146 words) - 13:55, 9 June 2009
• Feature percolation conventions
  '''Feature Percolation Conventions''' (FPCs) is a set of four mechanisms originally pr [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Feature+Percolation+Conventions&lemmacode=745 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  2 KB (247 words) - 20:39, 13 February 2009
• Inheritance
  '''Inheritance''' is a process in which a category 'inherits' some feature of a lower category. <br />
  1 KB (205 words) - 17:10, 15 February 2009
• Stress subordination principle
  ...f stress assignment. In this analysis stress assignment rules assign the [[feature]] [1stress] to vowels. The operation of subsequent stress rules is subject
  1 KB (156 words) - 08:12, 16 August 2014
• Quantoren-Floating
  B. Surányi, Differential Quantifier Scope: Q-Raising versus Q-Feature Checking. In: O. Bonami & P. C. Hofherr (Hg.), Empirical Issues in Formal S
  2 KB (215 words) - 12:24, 20 March 2008
• Atom Condition
  ...such as ''deduce'' and ''compose''. Given the further assumption that any feature marked on the head of a construction will percolate up to the node that dom
  2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
• Multicultural London English
  ...hire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2011. Contact, the Feature Pool and the Speech Community: The Emergence of Multicultural London Englis
  1 KB (140 words) - 09:09, 13 November 2012
• Funktionale Kategorie
  *Benmamoun, E. 2000. ''The Feature Structure of Functional Categories. A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. *v. Riemsdijk, H. 1998. Categorial Feature Magnetism: The Endocentricity and Distribution of Projections. ''JCGL'' 2,
  4 KB (522 words) - 18:16, 11 July 2007
• Trace model
  ...odes may be positively affected by excitatory connections with both lower (feature, phonemic) and higher (sentential) levels of representation. In this way, t
  2 KB (227 words) - 19:44, 29 August 2014
• Reciprocal construction
  ...nd for at least one set of arguments A, with |A| > or = 2; it is a typical feature of such constructions that one of the arguments denotes a set A as specifie
  1 KB (215 words) - 17:35, 24 July 2014
• Zero (Morphosyntax)
  :::*''"In other cases there is not even a grammatical feature: a single phonetic form, in the manner of homonymy, represents two meanings
  2 KB (339 words) - 16:47, 10 June 2009
• Third construction
  ...the result looks like a [[verb raising]] construction. The distinguishing feature is the impossibility of [[IPP]] in case of a third construction, and the fa
  2 KB (289 words) - 09:36, 17 August 2014
• Kopf-Bewegungsbeschränkung
  *Ž. Bošković, On Multiple Feature Checking: Multiple Wh-Fronting and Multiple Head Movement. In: S. Epstein &
  2 KB (233 words) - 16:18, 6 July 2014
• Separation hypothesis
  ...hypothesis there is a single L-rule of pluralization which simply adds the feature [plural]. The resulting abstract morpheme is input to different M-rules, an
  2 KB (267 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
• Tense
  '''Tense''' is traditionally defined as a grammatical feature or (deictic) category expressing a temporal relation between the event desc Alternatively, '''tense''' can be defined as a grammatical feature or (deictic) category encoding a temporal relation between the [[topic time
  6 KB (863 words) - 20:49, 23 May 2010
• Agreement
  ...t]] element agrees with a [[controller]] element in some [[morphosyntactic feature]].
  2 KB (298 words) - 08:27, 3 August 2014
• Mixed language
  ...guages (for example, [[Para-Romani]] varieties, [[Media Lengua]], [[Maa]]) feature a split between a vocabulary primarily derived from one language and a gram
  3 KB (337 words) - 16:52, 4 February 2013
• Case
  * for an abstract and often invisible/inaudible feature licensing the occurrence of noun phrases -- see [[abstract case]]
  3 KB (424 words) - 17:41, 21 June 2014
• Gebrauchsfrequenz
  Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. ''Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies''. La Hague: Mouton.
  3 KB (451 words) - 17:14, 29 June 2014
• Property
  ...imilarities between objects are called interval-scale concepts. If another feature is added, viz. a fixed point of reference (e.g. an absolute zero) ratio-sca ...ted are cardinal numbers in the interval [1,∞), i.e. the smallest possible value is 1 whereas an upper limit cannot be specified. This is a well-defined rat
  4 KB (691 words) - 14:05, 9 August 2014
• Bohumil Trnka
  ...quality, the functional load of an element is a quantitative complementary feature. Also Trnka’s scientific contribution to structural and functional morpho
  6 KB (840 words) - 12:43, 28 November 2007
• X-bar theory
  The value of X ranges over at least the categories N, A, V, P, the so-called lexical ...in English, Verbs and Prepositions, can now be referred to with the single feature [-N]. Thus, it becomes possible to characterize natural classes of syntacti
  5 KB (726 words) - 18:48, 7 September 2014
• Skoltsaamische Phonologie
  ...an die WALS-Kriterien an, so ergibt sich für das Feature [http://wals.info/feature/1A?s=20&z5=3000&z1=2999&z4=2998&z2=2997&z3=2996&tg_format=map&v1=c00d&v2=c9 Für das Feature [http://wals.info/feature/2A?s=20&z1=3000&z3=2999&z2=2998&tg_format=map&v1=c00d&v2=cfff&v3=cd00 ''Vow
  15 KB (1,920 words) - 20:58, 14 February 2013
• Jan Czekanowski
  <div align="center">Two-feature contingency table</div>
  7 KB (1,007 words) - 13:00, 28 November 2007
• Habitual aspect
  ...d as a single iterative situation rather than a characteristic or habitual feature of the person who is coughing.
  5 KB (728 words) - 21:32, 5 June 2010
• Portal:Semantics
  [[Componential analysis]] -- [[Conceptual Structure]] -- [[Semantic feature]] -- [[Sense relation]]<br>
  8 KB (928 words) - 09:11, 20 May 2010
• Main Page
  [[Brill-Tagger]], [[feature logic]], [[finite-state automata]], [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar|
  8 KB (758 words) - 10:19, 15 August 2023
• X-Bar-Theorie
  *van Riemsdijk, H. 1998. Categorial Feature Magnetism: The Endocentricity and Distribution of Projections. ''JCGL'' 199
  8 KB (1,011 words) - 09:51, 25 September 2007
• The middle voice
  The degree of distinguishability of participants is an important feature which distinguishes one-participant-events, middle events, reflexive events
  10 KB (1,414 words) - 09:32, 30 March 2008
• S.-Y. Kuroda/publications
  2003e. Projective feature geometry: a case study in Korean assimilation. In S. Rose (ed.), San Diego 2006. Feature geometry and phonetic features: A case study in voicing and coda nasalizati
  18 KB (2,647 words) - 12:19, 11 July 2021
• Code-switching
  ...e '''metalinguistic function''' occurs when speakers comment on a specific feature of a language by using the other language.
  10 KB (1,391 words) - 15:32, 31 January 2010
• Situation
  ...imilar to Declerck’s, but there are a few differences. He does not use the feature 'evolving'; processes and events are either agentive and nonagentive.
  11 KB (1,554 words) - 19:38, 21 October 2009
• Nominalphrase im Schwedischen
  ...eil des Substantives gesehen werden.<ref name="börjars">Börjars, Kersti: ''Feature Distribution in Swedish Noun Phrases.'' Oxford, Malden: The Philological So
  10 KB (1,435 words) - 14:03, 31 August 2013
• Kopf
  ...kolieren'', [[Perkolation]]) zu ihrem Kopf (was in der [[GPSG]] als ''Head Feature Convention'' 'Kopf-Merkmal Konvention' bezeichnet wird).
  9 KB (1,251 words) - 12:54, 9 August 2014
• Irony
  ...he other way around. Criticism or the implication of contempt is a central feature of irony: "Irony is always critical of somebody or has denigrating effects"
  13 KB (1,992 words) - 20:32, 4 July 2014
• Boris Isaakovič Jarcho
  ...t characteristic (1) implies the decrease of the frequency of another text feature (2).
  16 KB (2,394 words) - 17:14, 21 June 2014
• Phonologische und phonetische Universalien
  ...Joseph Harold (1966): ''Language Universals.'' With a special reference to feature hierarhchies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  19 KB (2,675 words) - 13:52, 30 September 2011
• Jerzy Woronczak
  ...s students (master’s and doctor’s degree candidates), and the third to the value of the popularisation of his achievements against the background of the rat ...uations (2) and (3). Its author, though, did not recommend calculating its value for m > 3 (Woronczak 1976).
  26 KB (3,899 words) - 14:02, 28 November 2007
• Tsez
  ...''elus eniy''. The plural demonstrative ''žedi'' ("they") also shows this feature, being ''žedi'' in the close group genitive 1 and ''žediz'' in the close
  50 KB (8,020 words) - 17:31, 2 March 2018