Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • '''IS A Condition''' is a condition proposed by Allen (1978) to express two salient facts about compounds: (a) ...is a noun as is ''boat'', and a ''houseboat'' is a kind of boat. The Is A Condition is the predecessor of Williams' (1981a) [[Righthand Head Rule]].
    857 bytes (128 words) - 16:11, 15 February 2009
  • '''I-within-i condition''' is a well-formedness condition in the [[GB]]-framework: ...s co-referential with the containing phrase ''his friend''. The i-within-i condition is relevant to the notion of [[accessibility]]. Also see [[governing catego
    574 bytes (82 words) - 16:04, 15 February 2009
  • '''Adjunct Condition''' is a [[Condition on Extraction Domain]] which forbids [[extraction]] out of an [[adjunct]]. This condition accounts for the ungrammaticality of sentences like (i) and (ii), where a '
    783 bytes (111 words) - 15:00, 22 January 2008
  • '''Well-Formedness Condition''' (WFC) is a condition which governs the way the [[CV skeleton]] has to be associated with the [[m *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Well-Formedness+Condition&lemmacode=84 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    997 bytes (141 words) - 18:19, 4 September 2014
  • ...heta criterion]]), and thus subsumes the [[Case filter]]. See also [[Chain condition]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Visibility+condition&lemmacode=118 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    579 bytes (81 words) - 08:49, 31 August 2014
  • '''Superiority condition''' is a condition on the application of [[transformation]]s, which states that, if a transfor ...y only once in deriving the [[s-structure]] of a sentence, the superiority condition predicts that in structure (i) ''what'' cannot be moved: ''who'' is superio
    2 KB (236 words) - 08:16, 16 August 2014
  • '''Subject Condition''' is a [[Condition on Extraction Domain]], stating the impossibility of extraction from subjec This condition accounts for the ill-formedness of (i) and (ii), where ''who'' and ''what''
    786 bytes (112 words) - 06:59, 16 August 2014
  • The '''Specified Subject Condition''' is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that: *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specified+Subject+Condition&lemmacode=243 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (196 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • '''Specificity Condition''' is a condition on [[movement]] which states that movement out of specific [[NP]]s leads to [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specificity+Condition&lemmacode=242 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (164 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • ...e theta-marker and the [[target]] of theta-marking to be [[sister]]s. This condition is proposed in Chomsky (1986b). [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Sisterhood+Condition&lemmacode=231 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    475 bytes (62 words) - 07:34, 3 November 2014
  • ...is the precursor of [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]]. The Opacity Condition states that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Opacity+Condition&lemmacode=472 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    642 bytes (92 words) - 10:43, 18 February 2009
  • '''Leftness condition''' is a [[condition]] proposed in [[Chomsky]] (1976) which states that a [[pronoun]] cannot be [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Leftness+condition&lemmacode=595 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    658 bytes (91 words) - 02:59, 6 August 2021
  • ...not contain anything beyond its input. Proposed in Chomsky (1995:225) as a condition met by the computational system of human language, and taken to imply that A language which meets the inclusiveness condition cannot contain traces or indices left after movement.
    574 bytes (81 words) - 16:58, 15 February 2009
  • '''Felicity condition''' is a convention regulating the appropriate use of [[performative]] utter [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Felicity+condition&lemmacode=746 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    672 bytes (94 words) - 03:37, 18 May 2009
  • ...n be no ambiguity of [[government]]. The 'absolute' form of the Minimality Condition states that a [[projection]] of an intermediate head serves as a [[barrier] ...rriers for government when 'a projection' is chosen in (i). The Minimality Condition is intended to exclude ambiguity of government, meaning that barriers creat
    2 KB (350 words) - 07:49, 3 November 2007
  • ...most recently attached by a morphological rule. Intuitively, the Adjacency Condition prevents a word formation rule from looking into the entire derivational hi ...be [klim]<sub>V</sub>]<sub>V</sub> baar]<sub>A</sub>''), and the Adjacency Condition makes the ''-baar'' suffixation rule insensitive to the intransitive nature
    2 KB (315 words) - 15:17, 22 January 2008
  • The '''adjunction condition''' is a condition which says that [[head]]s can [[adjoin]] only to [[head]]s and maximal [[pr *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Adjunction+condition&lemmacode=989 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    346 bytes (48 words) - 16:57, 20 September 2014
  • '''Atom Condition''' is a condition on word formation rules proposed in Williams (1981) which says that: ...of their [[head]]s. By replacing the [[Adjacency Condition]] with his Atom Condition, Williams is able to account for the fact the affixation rule which attache
    2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
  • In generative syntax, a '''binding condition''' is a condition on the [[binding]] possibilities of certain elements. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Binding+Condition&lemmacode=830 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    348 bytes (44 words) - 20:39, 14 March 2008
  • In genrative syntax, a '''chain condition''' is a wellformedness condition on [[chain]]s, which states that every [[chain]] (a<sub>1</sub>,...,a<sub>n ...[chain]]. This condition restates the [[case filter]] (or the [[visibility condition]]) and the [[Theta criterion]] in terms of [[chain]]s.
    858 bytes (119 words) - 15:30, 21 April 2008
  • '''Condition A''' is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+A&lemmacode=907 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    272 bytes (37 words) - 17:26, 20 September 2014
  • Condition B is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+B&lemmacode=908 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • Condition C is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+C&lemmacode=909 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • ...ested dependencies, such as the [[Subject condition]] and the [[ECP]]. The condition states that if two paths overlap, one must contain the other. The following [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Path+Containment+Condition&lemmacode=386 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:51, 19 February 2009
  • '''Morpheme Structure Condition (MSC)''' is a condition which expresses regularities about the [[phonological structure]] of [[morp [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morpheme+Structure+Condition+(MSC)&lemmacode=564 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • ...Move''. In the [[Minimalist Program]], the MLC accounts for [[superiority condition]] effects, [[wh-island]]s, and [[super raising]]. In chapter 4 of the Minim [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Minimal+Link+Condition&lemmacode=1527 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    589 bytes (81 words) - 18:23, 17 February 2009
  • '''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsk ...erred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions
    2 KB (253 words) - 07:34, 17 August 2014
  • In linguistics, '''condition on extraction domain''' is a condition of [[bounding theory]] formulated in Huang (1982) which restricts the class It includes the [[Subject Condition]] and the [[Adjunct Condition]].
    560 bytes (73 words) - 09:19, 11 February 2009
  • '''First Order Projection Condition''' is a condition proposed in Selkirk (1982) which says that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=First+Order+Projection+Condition&lemmacode=748 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    2 KB (281 words) - 20:57, 13 February 2009
  • A syntactic condition that movement must target a c-commanding position. ...t NP can move to HAVE because movement is known to obey the Proper Binding Condition. In (i), V c-commands N, so the nominal root may move to the light verb as
    963 bytes (111 words) - 13:14, 28 July 2021
  • ...involve categories of both W(ord)-structure and S(entence)-structure. This condition rules out a syntactic analysis of inflection, such as (a) the Affix Hopping *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word+Structure+Autonomy+Condition&lemmacode=99 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (140 words) - 18:35, 7 September 2014

Page text matches

  • ...is the precursor of [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]]. The Opacity Condition states that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Opacity+Condition&lemmacode=472 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    642 bytes (92 words) - 10:43, 18 February 2009
  • '''I-within-i condition''' is a well-formedness condition in the [[GB]]-framework: ...s co-referential with the containing phrase ''his friend''. The i-within-i condition is relevant to the notion of [[accessibility]]. Also see [[governing catego
    574 bytes (82 words) - 16:04, 15 February 2009
  • In linguistics, '''condition on extraction domain''' is a condition of [[bounding theory]] formulated in Huang (1982) which restricts the class It includes the [[Subject Condition]] and the [[Adjunct Condition]].
    560 bytes (73 words) - 09:19, 11 February 2009
  • ...not contain anything beyond its input. Proposed in Chomsky (1995:225) as a condition met by the computational system of human language, and taken to imply that A language which meets the inclusiveness condition cannot contain traces or indices left after movement.
    574 bytes (81 words) - 16:58, 15 February 2009
  • ...ested dependencies, such as the [[Subject condition]] and the [[ECP]]. The condition states that if two paths overlap, one must contain the other. The following [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Path+Containment+Condition&lemmacode=386 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:51, 19 February 2009
  • '''Adjunct Condition''' is a [[Condition on Extraction Domain]] which forbids [[extraction]] out of an [[adjunct]]. This condition accounts for the ungrammaticality of sentences like (i) and (ii), where a '
    783 bytes (111 words) - 15:00, 22 January 2008
  • ...e theta-marker and the [[target]] of theta-marking to be [[sister]]s. This condition is proposed in Chomsky (1986b). [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Sisterhood+Condition&lemmacode=231 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    475 bytes (62 words) - 07:34, 3 November 2014
  • In genrative syntax, a '''chain condition''' is a wellformedness condition on [[chain]]s, which states that every [[chain]] (a<sub>1</sub>,...,a<sub>n ...[chain]]. This condition restates the [[case filter]] (or the [[visibility condition]]) and the [[Theta criterion]] in terms of [[chain]]s.
    858 bytes (119 words) - 15:30, 21 April 2008
  • '''Condition A''' is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+A&lemmacode=907 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    272 bytes (37 words) - 17:26, 20 September 2014
  • Condition B is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+B&lemmacode=908 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • Condition C is one of the [[condition]]s of the [[binding theory]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Condition+C&lemmacode=909 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    265 bytes (37 words) - 17:28, 20 September 2014
  • ...most recently attached by a morphological rule. Intuitively, the Adjacency Condition prevents a word formation rule from looking into the entire derivational hi ...be [klim]<sub>V</sub>]<sub>V</sub> baar]<sub>A</sub>''), and the Adjacency Condition makes the ''-baar'' suffixation rule insensitive to the intransitive nature
    2 KB (315 words) - 15:17, 22 January 2008
  • ...heta criterion]]), and thus subsumes the [[Case filter]]. See also [[Chain condition]]. *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Visibility+condition&lemmacode=118 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    579 bytes (81 words) - 08:49, 31 August 2014
  • '''Atom Condition''' is a condition on word formation rules proposed in Williams (1981) which says that: ...of their [[head]]s. By replacing the [[Adjacency Condition]] with his Atom Condition, Williams is able to account for the fact the affixation rule which attache
    2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
  • '''IS A Condition''' is a condition proposed by Allen (1978) to express two salient facts about compounds: (a) ...is a noun as is ''boat'', and a ''houseboat'' is a kind of boat. The Is A Condition is the predecessor of Williams' (1981a) [[Righthand Head Rule]].
    857 bytes (128 words) - 16:11, 15 February 2009
  • The '''adjunction condition''' is a condition which says that [[head]]s can [[adjoin]] only to [[head]]s and maximal [[pr *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Adjunction+condition&lemmacode=989 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    346 bytes (48 words) - 16:57, 20 September 2014
  • In generative syntax, a '''binding condition''' is a condition on the [[binding]] possibilities of certain elements. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Binding+Condition&lemmacode=830 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    348 bytes (44 words) - 20:39, 14 March 2008
  • ...particular type of [[generalized quantifier]] Q (Q =/= 0) which obeys the condition in (i): ...e'' N are examples of ideals; ''not all'' N and ''at most'' N are not. The condition in (i) captures the contrast in (ii).
    766 bytes (131 words) - 16:11, 15 February 2009
  • ...Move''. In the [[Minimalist Program]], the MLC accounts for [[superiority condition]] effects, [[wh-island]]s, and [[super raising]]. In chapter 4 of the Minim [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Minimal+Link+Condition&lemmacode=1527 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    589 bytes (81 words) - 18:23, 17 February 2009
  • '''Subject Condition''' is a [[Condition on Extraction Domain]], stating the impossibility of extraction from subjec This condition accounts for the ill-formedness of (i) and (ii), where ''who'' and ''what''
    786 bytes (112 words) - 06:59, 16 August 2014
  • #REDIRECT[[Morpheme Structure Condition]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • ...cy condition subsumes both the [[Complex NP Constraint]] and the [[Subject Condition]]. The main principle of bounding theory is the [[Subjacency condition]], which forbids movement across more than one [[bounding node]].
    2 KB (245 words) - 15:37, 20 April 2008
  • ...''himself'' can be coreferential with ''Bill'' in (apparent) violation of Condition A. The co-referentiality of (ii) is considered one of logophoricity.
    951 bytes (143 words) - 10:17, 17 February 2009
  • ...[[phrase]], or if it is a 'designated element'. Part of the recoverability condition is subsumed under the [[ECP]]. See [[deletion]].
    568 bytes (78 words) - 08:33, 28 September 2014
  • ...with that relation. The name '''crossover''' derives from Ross's Crossover Condition: This condition accounts for the ill-formedness of the following sentence: the [[NP]] ''whi
    1 KB (165 words) - 16:02, 22 May 2008
  • ...not have to obey the [[Tensed-S Condition]] (TSC) and [[Specified Subject Condition]] (SSC) when moving to the next higher COMP. Thus, COMP functions as an esc
    1 KB (191 words) - 17:04, 13 February 2009
  • '''Leftness condition''' is a [[condition]] proposed in [[Chomsky]] (1976) which states that a [[pronoun]] cannot be [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Leftness+condition&lemmacode=595 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    658 bytes (91 words) - 02:59, 6 August 2021
  • ...involve categories of both W(ord)-structure and S(entence)-structure. This condition rules out a syntactic analysis of inflection, such as (a) the Affix Hopping *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word+Structure+Autonomy+Condition&lemmacode=99 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (140 words) - 18:35, 7 September 2014
  • More recently, the case filter has been reduced to the [[visibility condition]]. [[chain condition]]
    893 bytes (131 words) - 16:46, 9 April 2008
  • ...''a'' and coindexing of ''a'' and ''i'' would not violate the [[i-within-i condition]]. Also: condition on bound variable pronouns proposed in Higginbotham (1980) which accounts f
    646 bytes (82 words) - 17:53, 12 June 2014
  • ...Thus, Siegel's (1978) [[Adjacency Condition]] or Williams' (1981a) [[Atom Condition]] can be reduced to the Bracket Erasure Convention. *Siegel, D. 1978. The Adjacency Condition and the Theory of Morphology. ''NELS VIII'', 189-197.
    2 KB (227 words) - 15:40, 20 April 2008
  • ...n be no ambiguity of [[government]]. The 'absolute' form of the Minimality Condition states that a [[projection]] of an intermediate head serves as a [[barrier] ...rriers for government when 'a projection' is chosen in (i). The Minimality Condition is intended to exclude ambiguity of government, meaning that barriers creat
    2 KB (350 words) - 07:49, 3 November 2007
  • ...e [[head]] of a [[chain]] to the foot of the chain. See [[Path Containment Condition]].
    311 bytes (47 words) - 16:52, 19 February 2009
  • ...[[Theta-position]] without [[Case]]. NP-traces are anaphors, hence obey [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]].
    330 bytes (44 words) - 19:35, 17 February 2009
  • '''Morpheme Structure Condition (MSC)''' is a condition which expresses regularities about the [[phonological structure]] of [[morp [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morpheme+Structure+Condition+(MSC)&lemmacode=564 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • '''Well-Formedness Condition''' (WFC) is a condition which governs the way the [[CV skeleton]] has to be associated with the [[m *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Well-Formedness+Condition&lemmacode=84 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    997 bytes (141 words) - 18:19, 4 September 2014
  • ...oposes five global economy conditions: [[Last Resort]], the [[Minimal Link Condition]], [[Fewest Steps]], [[Procrastinate]] and [[Greed]]. These conditions comp A global version of the Minimal Link Condition (MLC) would compare the following two derivations:
    2 KB (277 words) - 15:36, 15 February 2009
  • A syntactic condition that movement must target a c-commanding position. ...t NP can move to HAVE because movement is known to obey the Proper Binding Condition. In (i), V c-commands N, so the nominal root may move to the light verb as
    963 bytes (111 words) - 13:14, 28 July 2021
  • '''First Order Projection Condition''' is a condition proposed in Selkirk (1982) which says that [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=First+Order+Projection+Condition&lemmacode=748 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    2 KB (281 words) - 20:57, 13 February 2009
  • '''Superiority condition''' is a condition on the application of [[transformation]]s, which states that, if a transfor ...y only once in deriving the [[s-structure]] of a sentence, the superiority condition predicts that in structure (i) ''what'' cannot be moved: ''who'' is superio
    2 KB (236 words) - 08:16, 16 August 2014
  • '''Tensed-S Condition''' (TSC) is one of the conditions on [[transformation]]s proposed by Chomsk ...erred to as PIC (Propositional Island Condition) or NIC (Nominative Island Condition). More recently, the TSC has been subsumed under the [[binding]] conditions
    2 KB (253 words) - 07:34, 17 August 2014
  • The '''Specified Subject Condition''' is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that: *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specified+Subject+Condition&lemmacode=243 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (196 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • '''Specificity Condition''' is a condition on [[movement]] which states that movement out of specific [[NP]]s leads to [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specificity+Condition&lemmacode=242 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (164 words) - 07:59, 4 November 2014
  • A verb expressing a meteorological condition, such as ''rain'' or ''snow'', which is a predicate either without an argum
    458 bytes (61 words) - 18:15, 4 September 2014
  • ...theory]]<nowiki>: since </nowiki>''her'' is a [[pronominal]] it must obey condition B which says that ''she'' may not locally [[bind]] ''her''. It is assumed t
    881 bytes (134 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2009
  • '''Right Roof Constraint''' is a condition on [[rightward movement]] first formulated by Ross (1967:185): This condition captures the fact that rightward movement is upward bounded, as the followi
    1 KB (208 words) - 18:24, 28 September 2014
  • This condition accounts for the ungrammaticality of the sentence:
    766 bytes (116 words) - 10:59, 6 May 2008
  • ...y's (1976) [[Leftness condition]], Higginbotham's (1980) [[Accessibility]] Condition, Safir's (1984) PCOB, Reinhart's (1983) S-Structure c-command requirement.
    2 KB (356 words) - 02:48, 6 August 2021
  • '''Licensing''' is a it has been proposed that [[well-formedness condition]]s on [[syntactic structure]] (esp. the principle of [[Full Interpretation]
    823 bytes (122 words) - 20:56, 16 February 2009
  • ...ential expressions. With respect to [[binding theory]], R-expressions obey condition C, which says that they must be [[A-free]]. This explains the illformedness
    1 KB (158 words) - 14:50, 20 February 2009
  • ...man'' and the pair behaves as a [[chain]] with regard to the [[visibility condition]].
    703 bytes (107 words) - 18:04, 19 April 2008
  • ...s important theoretical consequences have been drawn. It follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items.
    2 KB (216 words) - 08:50, 10 August 2014
  • ...bject Constraint falls under the [[Subject condition]] of Huang's (1982) [[Condition on Extraction Domain]].
    1 KB (200 words) - 18:56, 28 October 2014
  • ...ence, ''each other'' must be [[bound]] within this IP in compliance with [[condition A]] of the [[binding theory]], and may not be coindexed with ''the girls'',
    1 KB (156 words) - 18:21, 17 February 2009
  • The second part of the constraint can now be subsumed under the [[Adjunct Condition]], given that [[extraposition]] is an adjunction operation.
    1 KB (185 words) - 22:40, 13 February 2009
  • '''Truth table''' is the device by which the [[truth condition]]s of a complex [[propositional formula]] can be represented. By means of t
    607 bytes (81 words) - 08:04, 30 August 2014
  • ...rty of being left upward monotone if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    997 bytes (161 words) - 20:09, 16 February 2009
  • ...tractability (Island conditions) are often designated as the [[Wh-island]] Condition, the [[Complex NP Constraint]] (CNPC), and the [[Coordinate Structure Const
    899 bytes (112 words) - 22:13, 15 February 2009
  • ...-marking is invoked to explain the [[Subject Condition]] and the [[Adjunct Condition]]. EXAMPLE: : only in (ii)a is ''who'' moved out of an L-marked phrase (=/=
    2 KB (252 words) - 07:15, 16 August 2014
  • [[P. Mecner]], The Recoverability Condition in Polish and German. Societas Linguistica Europaea 33rd Annual Meeting, Po Englisch [[recoverability]] (condition) <br>
    2 KB (217 words) - 20:04, 25 July 2014
  • '''Felicity condition''' is a convention regulating the appropriate use of [[performative]] utter [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Felicity+condition&lemmacode=746 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    672 bytes (94 words) - 03:37, 18 May 2009
  • ...S-structure is putatively defined by conditions such as the [[subjacency]] condition.
    610 bytes (78 words) - 15:56, 5 October 2014
  • ...logical languages are both seen as sets of sentences of which the [[truth condition]]s have to be specified relative to a [[model]], an abstract representation
    910 bytes (127 words) - 10:21, 17 February 2009
  • [[island condition]]
    1 KB (171 words) - 17:03, 6 February 2008
  • The notion of connectedness has been resolved under the [[Path Containment Condition]].
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:00, 9 May 2008
  • ...miner D is left downward monotone if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    1 KB (167 words) - 20:08, 16 February 2009
  • ...ametricality can be assigned by rule and is subject to the [[Peripherality Condition]]<nowiki>: extrametrical elements are always peripheral (found at one edge ...le of the noun ''párent'' is lost in the derived word by the Peripherality Condition and the stress rules reapply. Schematized in the grid:
    2 KB (266 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2019
  • ...lantic Treaty Organization'', ''First Order Principle'' and ''Free Element Condition'', respectively. Some [[Dutch]] examples are: ''TROS'', ''KNAV'' and ''DAF'
    1 KB (140 words) - 17:23, 12 February 2009
  • ...sh ''a/an'' allomorphs (''a book'' vs. ''an apple'') is handled by a Shape Condition.
    759 bytes (104 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
  • ...nals are marked as [+pronominal, -anaphoric], and are subject to Binding [[condition B]]. ..., his, him'' in (i)-(iii) are pronominals. With respect to binding theory, condition B states that pronominals may either be [[free]] (as in (i) and (ii)b), or
    2 KB (328 words) - 19:11, 27 September 2014
  • ...since formant structures would be substantially different in the biteblock condition. This compensation is there on the very first trial: thus, it cannot be bas
    1 KB (193 words) - 13:39, 19 March 2008
  • ...d only if for all the subsets X and Y of the domains of entities E and E', condition (i) holds.
    2 KB (274 words) - 20:24, 13 February 2009
  • ...assigned to [[sentence]]s (or [[proposition]]s or [[formula]]s) in [[truth-condition]]al semantics. A sentence can be true (also 1 or T) or false (also 0 or F)
    802 bytes (118 words) - 08:30, 30 August 2014
  • ...s of a number of [[lexical transformation]]s. See [[First Order Projection Condition]].
    1 KB (202 words) - 20:58, 13 February 2009
  • Historical continuity between the forms compared is a necessary condition to be considered cognate. Yet, several factors lead to lack in continuity.
    1 KB (222 words) - 17:08, 29 October 2007
  • ...on) and a [[governee]]. Government is usually considered to be a necessary condition for [[case-marking]] and for [[proper government]] (see [[ECP]]). A range o
    2 KB (275 words) - 15:42, 15 February 2009
  • ...al economy]] conditions [[Last Resort]], [[Greed]], and the [[Minimal Link Condition]]. The MLC is always respected because a [[functional head]] which has a fe
    2 KB (269 words) - 04:44, 7 October 2007
  • ...ical properties, such as [[theta-role]]s and Case visibility ([[visibility condition]]) are properties of maximal chains. A chain is maximal if it contains a [[
    3 KB (469 words) - 15:00, 16 April 2008
  • ...ath>Y_2,</math> ..., <math>Y_n </math> is interpreted as a well-formedness condition for [[local tree|local trees]]: It licenses all local trees with a root ''X
    890 bytes (124 words) - 20:42, 3 July 2014
  • ...miner has the property of variety if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    867 bytes (145 words) - 09:00, 30 August 2014
  • In some cases, Pied Piping is obligatory, due to the [[Left Branch Condition]].
    1 KB (174 words) - 15:55, 5 March 2011
  • ...e confused with so-called [[R-expressions]], i.e. NPs which are subject to condition C of the [[binding theory]] ('R-expressions must be free').
    1 KB (176 words) - 08:36, 28 September 2014
  • ...is returned to its pre-movement position prior to the operation of binding condition A. Other analyses of such "reconstruction phenomena" can involve an extende
    2 KB (294 words) - 12:15, 21 February 2009
  • ...list Program]], wh-islands are analyzed as an effect of the [[Minimal Link Condition]].
    1 KB (170 words) - 18:30, 4 September 2014
  • ...icular type of [[generalized quantifier]] Q, (Q is not empty), which obeys condition (i) in a domain of entities E:
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:20, 29 June 2014
  • ...monotonicity|downward monotone]] if and only if in a domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    1 KB (188 words) - 16:47, 28 September 2014
  • ...otone]] if and only if for all subsets X and Y of the domain of entities E condition (i) holds.
    1 KB (188 words) - 18:28, 28 September 2014
  • |'''[[CON]]'''||[[condition]]
    3 KB (372 words) - 10:32, 6 July 2007
  • *E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Hg.), Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast. Cognitive Processes and Discourse Perspectives. Berl
    2 KB (241 words) - 16:21, 15 October 2007
  • ...cy relation is sensitive to locality conditions such as Subjacency and the Condition on Extraction Domain.
    1 KB (182 words) - 02:47, 31 July 2021
  • ...ess clauses is explained by the [[Menzerath-Altmann Law]] and the boundary condition that clauses are immediate constituents of a sentence.
    2 KB (366 words) - 10:31, 16 August 2007
  • ...a [[variable]], must be [[A-free]], binding by ''he'' would constitute a [[Condition C]] violation. To be distinguished from [[weak crossover]].
    1 KB (205 words) - 08:55, 10 August 2014
  • ...nly the locutionary act is seen to be relevant with respect to the [[truth condition]]s.
    1 KB (218 words) - 08:13, 1 June 2014
  • ...e denotational theory is typical of [[logical semantics]] which is [[truth condition]]al and [[model]]-theoretic (Montague (1970), Gamut 1991).
    3 KB (358 words) - 18:19, 17 February 2009
  • His study in Germany was a condition of his employment from 1913–21 as Assistant Professor of Comparative Phil
    2 KB (342 words) - 19:18, 21 October 2007
  • *Taraldsen, K.T. 1978. ''On the Nominative Island Condition, vacuous application and the that-t filter.'' Bloomington: Indiana Universi
    1 KB (191 words) - 11:50, 11 March 2010
  • Condition that has to be fulfilled for a sentence to be either true or false. The sen
    1 KB (241 words) - 19:05, 27 September 2014
  • * Taraldsen, T. 1978. ''On the Nominative Island Condition, vacuous application and the that-trace filter,'' distributed by IULC.
    2 KB (245 words) - 08:54, 17 August 2014
  • ...inguistik.'' Kallmeyer, Werner u. a. (Hrsg.), 213-245 (englisch 1970. On a Condition of the Coherence of Texts. In ''Semiotica 2/70'': 335-363).
    2 KB (269 words) - 20:35, 6 January 2008
  • ...sp;A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-line, but the B-line will always succeed. These are considerably r
    2 KB (258 words) - 21:31, 26 December 2016
  • must obey condition (iii): This condition excludes the possibility of endless projection loops, i.e. phrases like the
    5 KB (726 words) - 18:48, 7 September 2014
  • ...prinzip der NGG ist die sog. Natürlichkeitsbedingung (''strong naturalness condition''), derzufolge in syntaktischen Ableitungsprozessen solche Ableitungsebenen
    2 KB (289 words) - 10:06, 31 October 2007
  • '''Theta Criterion''' is a condition which states that at [[D-structure]] each [[argument]] is in a [[theta-posi
    2 KB (282 words) - 09:34, 17 August 2014
  • ...ther [[formula]]s from the axioms. The semantics provides a set of [[truth condition]]s defining when a formula is true given an interpretation of its basic exp
    2 KB (301 words) - 17:50, 21 September 2014
  • ...inguistik.'' Kallmeyer, Werner u. a. (Hrsg.), 213-245 (englisch 1970. On a Condition of the Coherence of Texts. In ''Semiotica 2/70'': 335-363).
    3 KB (305 words) - 14:35, 18 December 2007
  • ...it'' behave like [[Class II affix]]<nowiki>es, in that they fail either to condition or to undergo the cyclic phonological rules; (b) such compounds cannot unde
    2 KB (272 words) - 16:12, 8 July 2009
  • ...for instance, ''happy'', and ''un-'' to ''happier'', and the phonological condition on ''-er'' suffixation is not violated. Hence, the phonologically motivated
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • ...e statement. Performatives do not have [[truth condition]]s but [[felicity condition]]s.
    10 KB (1,477 words) - 13:07, 2 March 2018
  • ...rinciple]] -- [[Descriptive meaning]] -- [[Emotive meaning]] -- [[Felicity condition]] -- [[Fixed-context assumption]] -- [[Gricean maxims]] -- [[Implicature]]
    8 KB (928 words) - 09:11, 20 May 2010
  • ...inguistik.'' Kallmeyer, Werner u. a. (Hrsg.), 213-245 (englisch 1970. On a Condition of the Coherence of Texts. In ''Semiotica 2/70'': 335-363).
    9 KB (1,072 words) - 12:36, 2 March 2018
  • *– Ders. & M.-K. Park, The EPP and the Subject Condition under Sluicing. LIn 2003/34, 649–660.
    9 KB (1,251 words) - 12:54, 9 August 2014
  • (1) “All those chips which they would under any condition call ''x''.
    14 KB (2,063 words) - 14:53, 20 May 2013
  • 1976d. Headless relative clauses in Modern Japanese and the Relevancy Condition. BLS 7. 269-279.
    18 KB (2,647 words) - 12:19, 11 July 2021
  • ...tains the verbs with the variable ending ''-d'' (before a vowel) / ''-y'' (elsewhere). ...un stands in the absolutive case and is thus unmarked. If an environmental condition is described in form of an adjective, the adjective requires class IV agree
    50 KB (8,020 words) - 17:31, 2 March 2018